External SSD

Started 11 months ago | Questions
jamesbm
Regular MemberPosts: 151
Like?
External SSD
11 months ago

Hi

Will using an external SSD offer a significant speed increase in Lightroom 4.3 over a conventional internal macbook HDD? And would an internal SSD much faster?

Many thanks,

ANSWER:
This question has not been answered yet.
steephill
Veteran MemberPosts: 8,890
Like?
Re: External SSD
In reply to jamesbm, 11 months ago

This Computer Darkroom article covers your questions nicely.

-- hide signature --

Steve
www.pbase.com/steephill

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Toermalijn
Forum ProPosts: 12,417
Like?
Re: External SSD
In reply to jamesbm, 11 months ago

jamesbm wrote:

Hi

Will using an external SSD offer a significant speed increase in Lightroom 4.3 over a conventional internal macbook HDD? And would an internal SSD much faster?

Many thanks,

If you swap your normal hdd for the ssd, then yes. If you use it external and usb 2.0 then no.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Deleted1929
Forum ProPosts: 13,050
Like?
Re: External SSD
In reply to Toermalijn, 11 months ago

Just to clarify USB 2.0 is limited to about 23 MB/sec in practice and USB 3.0 to more like 150-200 MB/sec.

A typical HDD can shift data at about 80-150 MB/sec ( varies over the position on the drive as well as the specific model ).

A typical SDD is very fast in two ways :

(1) Transferring large amounts of data serially ( e.g. GB's at a go ), where they can reach as high as 500 MB/sec ( which you only get if you use an internal drive and only then on SATA III and in ideal conditions ).  SATA II interfaces are limited to 300 MB/sec even in ideal conditions.

(2) Randomly accessing data all over the drive ( a typical boot up or server behavior ).  This is why SDDs are popular for speeding up boot-up and application launch and for servers.  It can make a desktop seem a bit more responsive.

In practical terms using an SDD should be internally as your main drive for booting and storing applications.  Data can be stored on larger and cheaper HDDs with almost no practical impact on performance.

An external HDD over a USB 3.0 connection is very fast in practice.

-- hide signature --

StephenG

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Toermalijn
Forum ProPosts: 12,417
Like?
Re: External SSD
In reply to Deleted1929, 11 months ago

sjgcit wrote:

Just to clarify USB 2.0 is limited to about 23 MB/sec in practice and USB 3.0 to more like 150-200 MB/sec.

A typical HDD can shift data at about 80-150 MB/sec ( varies over the position on the drive as well as the specific model ).

A typical SDD is very fast in two ways :

(1) Transferring large amounts of data serially ( e.g. GB's at a go ), where they can reach as high as 500 MB/sec ( which you only get if you use an internal drive and only then on SATA III and in ideal conditions ).  SATA II interfaces are limited to 300 MB/sec even in ideal conditions.

(2) Randomly accessing data all over the drive ( a typical boot up or server behavior ).  This is why SDDs are popular for speeding up boot-up and application launch and for servers.  It can make a desktop seem a bit more responsive.

In practical terms using an SDD should be internally as your main drive for booting and storing applications.  Data can be stored on larger and cheaper HDDs with almost no practical impact on performance.

An external HDD over a USB 3.0 connection is very fast in practice.

-- hide signature --

StephenG

While this is true, an external ssd won't speed up boot time of applications or the system.

Do you need ssd speed to load a relative small file? NO...a regular usb drive is fast enough and an external usb 3 ssd drive is a waste of money. Better invest in more RAM or more internal ssd's.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads