Wedding with OM-D

Started Apr 30, 2013 | Discussions
Loga
Contributing MemberPosts: 791Gear list
Like?
Wedding with OM-D
Apr 30, 2013

I just took photos without trying to create a whole report, however, in the end I like the series I got

The OM-D was a very good partner providing - as you see - decent image quality. I used three primes: 14, 25 (pana), and 45 (Oly). I love the 14, offers a lot of space in the pictures. It is a very good lens, but not high-end. The other two has no compromises, at least in my photography.

The OM-D responded quick, however, I understand why one would not choose it when taking wedding photos was a paid work. Maybe a little slow when it comes to AF in low light, however, I don't have current experiences with DSLR's. And it offers good noise with primes, but primes has to be changed, and you can miss moments. As a hobbyst, I can do that, but I suppose a pro can't. Summary, as a hobbyst, I was very confident with the camera, the primes, and the result.

C&Cs are welcome.

 Loga's gear list:Loga's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +1 more
cadet stimpy
Regular MemberPosts: 234Gear list
Like?
Re: Wedding with OM-D
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

The first and the last are my faves - cheers to the tops lady!

 cadet stimpy's gear list:cadet stimpy's gear list
Canon PowerShot S110 RX100 III Fujifilm X-E1
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
eliaspt
Regular MemberPosts: 174
Like?
Re: Wedding with OM-D
In reply to cadet stimpy, Apr 30, 2013

You have some very nice shots there! Having a decent flash would have made a world of difference though.

Cheers

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Robert Garcia NYC
Contributing MemberPosts: 972Gear list
Like?
Re: Wedding with OM-D
In reply to eliaspt, Apr 30, 2013

Olympus rocks with color...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Hen3ry
Senior MemberPosts: 9,186Gear list
Like?
Re: Wedding with OM-D
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

Good job, Loga. I;,m not sure what you’re saying about the 14mm -- you’ve taken first class pix with it here and obviously like the FoV (as I do). In fact, in my view, the best pix of an excellent set are taken with the 14mm, with the dancing bridal waltz pic @ 1/10 probably the best of the lot.

A real professional job.

Cheers, geoff

 Hen3ry's gear list:Hen3ry's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Jorginho
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,152Gear list
Like?
Oke
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

I am not a wedding photgrapher and it am not saying I would be doing it any better. I could in fact easily do worse and shooting weddings, like any other specific type of shooting demands some skills you do not get wihthout practice I think.

The first shot is a very good one I feel. B&W gives a classy look, I see the subject and I see where the subject is.

But from that onwards I have to say I it seems like some of the guest just snapped around with a cam. Because rarely can I tell you used a good camera with some of the best lenses for it.The Leica has such a lovely bokeh but I see it virtually nowhere.

I do not see well thought out shots bar a few, but I guess you were not THE wedding photographer so I understand it is not always possible (or not possible at all).

Some things I would advise you to do, from a total rookey here to another (I surmise)

Think about what you want to capture. In weedings, I can think of this:

- People having fun and partying (you did that al right)
- Weddings of courser are a strange mix of an exubarant party AND intimacy if not tears. I miss intimacy a lot here.
- How is the light? May be you can look at points that would give beautiful shots, beautiful framing and wait until the right subjects come by instead of only following the subjects to wherever they go.
- Be very critical of your framing and what IS the subject and what is clearly not. I see way too much in many pics, so to me, it becomes mess.
- Less is more not vie versa. Do not try to get to much information for us in the pic.

To me more specific, a lot of comments on quite a few pics:

Pic 2: overexposed, I see the car and then, oh wait...I see two people waving. I also see some guy not dressed appropriate for the party (;-)) walking by...The thought is good, the execution not and this pic to me has no place in a nice series of a wedding.

Pic3. I would focus much more on the girl, zoom in (come closer in the case of primes). The light is too harsh and contrasty with the dark background for my taste. You could have made a lot more of that scene I think

Pic4: get lots closer and fill this with a flash. The subject is too far away and completely overrun by the light outside. Better to try to be at a 90 degree angle from the light I think. The thought is a good one, an exciting moment entering the church.

Pic5: What is the subject here? keep the horizon straight or straighten it in PP. Looking at peoples back that are prominent is not very helpful in general. You do this in a pci with dancers too: the main subject is theback. It is like taking a macro of a fly and focussing on its rear end rather than the eyes...

Pic6: Both should be in focus to be perfect. Other wise a great moment and a good enough pic. Would have liked to see it with a 30 degree angel or so. But this is okey.

Pic 7: No expert as I said, but a fill flash would do great. The light behind them is too distracting for me.

Pic8: close up! We only need to see the eyebrows, to the chin I think. Otherwise fine. Again. I see them kissing and I see others kissing. I understand that some pics need to get the atmosphere but it is not these kind of pics I think.

Pic9: Background spoils this one. I would have focussed on her and the three women eager to get married themselves. Her in focus and the rest blurred is really good though. If I only look at those and single them out form the other information in that pic, I actually love it.I miss her legs though.

Pic10: no purpose for this one. I understand that you picture this to see how others shot them etc. A situation. But it is not compelling.

Pic11: flowers  at the back are nice, the kids e  cbehind them again blow this shot for me. But it is difficult. You were at f2 so f1.8 would not have helped a whole lot. I can't say another angle would have been better. Also I am not sure getting closer would have helped with the composition, because the composition of the two is good. It would have made the back ground blurrier. I would have tried to get them in such a way that I could get them and a background of somewhat blurred flowers. But you were not THE photgrapher, so you'll have to take it as it comes I guess.

Pic12: Nothing wrong with this shot that you can help I think. Background is unromantic to me. Again there may have been little choice. A FF cam with a fast lens would have blurred it more I think. The light is not very nice either.

Pic13: get in closer I'd say, mainly because I hate the that background. A steal bridge?? Use f1.4 in these situations so there is some background but we cannot tell it is some awful looking bridge (for a wedding). Again: it seems like the place was not too romantic? More green and trees and flowers in a nice garden would have been nicer and were not helpful to you I think.

Even though I am not feeling to well today hence I can spend some time on this I'll stop here.

Again: correct me if I am wrong, because i am no expert!!

 Jorginho's gear list:Jorginho's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Loga
Contributing MemberPosts: 791Gear list
Like?
Re: Oke
In reply to Jorginho, Apr 30, 2013

You have some good point here, even if I may argue with you in a few;)

Thank you for taking your time! I will respond later in details. Get well!

 Loga's gear list:Loga's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Loga
Contributing MemberPosts: 791Gear list
Like?
Re: Wedding with OM-D
In reply to Hen3ry, Apr 30, 2013

Thank you, Geoffrey, glad that you liked them

The 14mm is a good lens, I really like it! However, it is obvious, that at that size it is unable to handle some issues that bigger lenses are. For example, it has quite a lot CA, especially when wide open (look at the picture taken in the church in front of the pair), and sometimes a little more subject isolation would be nice - look at the picture when the bride throws the flower! Maybe a bigger, more 25 1.4 Leica -like 14mm would be my choice. But this little lens do the work decently.

Hen3ry wrote:

Good job, Loga. I;,m not sure what you’re saying about the 14mm -- you’ve taken first class pix with it here and obviously like the FoV (as I do). In fact, in my view, the best pix of an excellent set are taken with the 14mm, with the dancing bridal waltz pic @ 1/10 probably the best of the lot.

A real professional job.

Cheers, geoff

 Loga's gear list:Loga's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Jorginho
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,152Gear list
Like?
Oke, PP some pics (quick and dirty..)
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

SOme other framing, blurred the back ground, contrast and brightness. I did it very quick, so far from perfect even for my skills (others are MUCH better at this). I only have the rtest package of Adobe PS 6 for 4 days or so..Some are oversatured now but you can see you can retrieve some data out of the highlights or by cutting out some information (background etc) I think the thing looks better. It is all a matter of taste, but anways. Hope it helps you a bit..

With hte lasso in PP6 and than blurred the background, retrieved highlight and shadow info. Too bad the purple jacket (or the jacket became purple) but with some effort you can deal with that.

relly quick one, just cut out the rest and tried to blur the BG a bit more. Retrieved highlights etc.

Blurred BG, mor saturation and highlight. Her hair looks much better I think

Again brightened uo things a bit and blurred a bit more.

 Jorginho's gear list:Jorginho's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
fr3d33
Forum MemberPosts: 53
Like?
Re: Oke, PP some pics (quick and dirty..)
In reply to Jorginho, Apr 30, 2013

Personally, I am impressed. Wedding captures aren't easy, but you made some very happy, very well thought out choices as a hobbyist. I agree that a little post processing could help tighten/crop things up and brighten things up, but I wouldn't go too heavy handed with the blurring because your originals are quite lovely. They beautifully capture quite a happy moment and avoid the trap of being overtly pretentious. Too much pp work may take the magic out of your work and make it too artificial. I'm not sure how much my opinion is worth, FYI, I'm barely a hobbyist! But I do like your shots, ESP the 14mm as someone already pointed out!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Jorginho
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,152Gear list
Like?
I stole his pics..last two examples...
In reply to fr3d33, Apr 30, 2013

And the PP was by me. The blurring is just an example, I too wondered if they added something but while I was at it...tired It. found many of thebackground simply too destracting from an otherwise good shot. But I do find most pics were way too dark. Otherwise some indeed are nice.

I'll stop here.

 Jorginho's gear list:Jorginho's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Landscapephoto99
Senior MemberPosts: 2,487
Like?
Re: Wedding with OM-D
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

Nice photos in some tough lighting!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Loga
Contributing MemberPosts: 791Gear list
Like?
Re: Oke
In reply to Jorginho, Apr 30, 2013

Jorginho wrote:

I am not a wedding photgrapher and it am not saying I would be doing it any better. I could in fact easily do worse and shooting weddings, like any other specific type of shooting demands some skills you do not get wihthout practice I think.

The first shot is a very good one I feel. B&W gives a classy look, I see the subject and I see where the subject is.

But from that onwards I have to say I it seems like some of the guest just snapped around with a cam. Because rarely can I tell you used a good camera with some of the best lenses for it.The Leica has such a lovely bokeh but I see it virtually nowhere.

I do not see well thought out shots bar a few, but I guess you were not THE wedding photographer so I understand it is not always possible (or not possible at all).

Some things I would advise you to do, from a total rookey here to another (I surmise)

Think about what you want to capture. In weedings, I can think of this:

- People having fun and partying (you did that al right)
- Weddings of courser are a strange mix of an exubarant party AND intimacy if not tears. I miss intimacy a lot here.
- How is the light? May be you can look at points that would give beautiful shots, beautiful framing and wait until the right subjects come by instead of only following the subjects to wherever they go.
- Be very critical of your framing and what IS the subject and what is clearly not. I see way too much in many pics, so to me, it becomes mess.
- Less is more not vie versa. Do not try to get to much information for us in the pic.

To me more specific, a lot of comments on quite a few pics:

Pic 2: overexposed, I see the car and then, oh wait...I see two people waving. I also see some guy not dressed appropriate for the party (;-)) walking by...The thought is good, the execution not and this pic to me has no place in a nice series of a wedding.

Pic3. I would focus much more on the girl, zoom in (come closer in the case of primes). The light is too harsh and contrasty with the dark background for my taste. You could have made a lot more of that scene I think

Pic4: get lots closer and fill this with a flash. The subject is too far away and completely overrun by the light outside. Better to try to be at a 90 degree angle from the light I think. The thought is a good one, an exciting moment entering the church.

Pic5: What is the subject here? keep the horizon straight or straighten it in PP. Looking at peoples back that are prominent is not very helpful in general. You do this in a pci with dancers too: the main subject is theback. It is like taking a macro of a fly and focussing on its rear end rather than the eyes...

Pic6: Both should be in focus to be perfect. Other wise a great moment and a good enough pic. Would have liked to see it with a 30 degree angel or so. But this is okey.

Pic 7: No expert as I said, but a fill flash would do great. The light behind them is too distracting for me.

Pic8: close up! We only need to see the eyebrows, to the chin I think. Otherwise fine. Again. I see them kissing and I see others kissing. I understand that some pics need to get the atmosphere but it is not these kind of pics I think.

Pic9: Background spoils this one. I would have focussed on her and the three women eager to get married themselves. Her in focus and the rest blurred is really good though. If I only look at those and single them out form the other information in that pic, I actually love it.I miss her legs though.

Pic10: no purpose for this one. I understand that you picture this to see how others shot them etc. A situation. But it is not compelling.

Pic11: flowers  at the back are nice, the kids e  cbehind them again blow this shot for me. But it is difficult. You were at f2 so f1.8 would not have helped a whole lot. I can't say another angle would have been better. Also I am not sure getting closer would have helped with the composition, because the composition of the two is good. It would have made the back ground blurrier. I would have tried to get them in such a way that I could get them and a background of somewhat blurred flowers. But you were not THE photgrapher, so you'll have to take it as it comes I guess.

Pic12: Nothing wrong with this shot that you can help I think. Background is unromantic to me. Again there may have been little choice. A FF cam with a fast lens would have blurred it more I think. The light is not very nice either.

Pic13: get in closer I'd say, mainly because I hate the that background. A steal bridge?? Use f1.4 in these situations so there is some background but we cannot tell it is some awful looking bridge (for a wedding). Again: it seems like the place was not too romantic? More green and trees and flowers in a nice garden would have been nicer and were not helpful to you I think.

Even though I am not feeling to well today hence I can spend some time on this I'll stop here.

Again: correct me if I am wrong, because i am no expert!!

 Loga's gear list:Loga's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Loga
Contributing MemberPosts: 791Gear list
Like?
Re: Oke
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

Oh dear, WHAT THE HELL HAS HAPPENED HERE?!!! My complete reply went gone! I answered every point you raised carefully, but after posting it it disappeared and only your original post appeared without my responses Unfortunatelly I don't have the time to retype it again

In (very-very) summary: I agree with some of your aspects, I don't with a few But it is very disappointing to work on an answer that much and being unable to send it in the end

Loga wrote:

Jorginho wrote:

I am not a wedding photgrapher and it am not saying I would be doing it any better. I could in fact easily do worse and shooting weddings, like any other specific type of shooting demands some skills you do not get wihthout practice I think.

The first shot is a very good one I feel. B&W gives a classy look, I see the subject and I see where the subject is.

But from that onwards I have to say I it seems like some of the guest just snapped around with a cam. Because rarely can I tell you used a good camera with some of the best lenses for it.The Leica has such a lovely bokeh but I see it virtually nowhere.

I do not see well thought out shots bar a few, but I guess you were not THE wedding photographer so I understand it is not always possible (or not possible at all).

Some things I would advise you to do, from a total rookey here to another (I surmise)

Think about what you want to capture. In weedings, I can think of this:

- People having fun and partying (you did that al right)
- Weddings of courser are a strange mix of an exubarant party AND intimacy if not tears. I miss intimacy a lot here.
- How is the light? May be you can look at points that would give beautiful shots, beautiful framing and wait until the right subjects come by instead of only following the subjects to wherever they go.
- Be very critical of your framing and what IS the subject and what is clearly not. I see way too much in many pics, so to me, it becomes mess.
- Less is more not vie versa. Do not try to get to much information for us in the pic.

To me more specific, a lot of comments on quite a few pics:

Pic 2: overexposed, I see the car and then, oh wait...I see two people waving. I also see some guy not dressed appropriate for the party (;-)) walking by...The thought is good, the execution not and this pic to me has no place in a nice series of a wedding.

Pic3. I would focus much more on the girl, zoom in (come closer in the case of primes). The light is too harsh and contrasty with the dark background for my taste. You could have made a lot more of that scene I think

Pic4: get lots closer and fill this with a flash. The subject is too far away and completely overrun by the light outside. Better to try to be at a 90 degree angle from the light I think. The thought is a good one, an exciting moment entering the church.

Pic5: What is the subject here? keep the horizon straight or straighten it in PP. Looking at peoples back that are prominent is not very helpful in general. You do this in a pci with dancers too: the main subject is theback. It is like taking a macro of a fly and focussing on its rear end rather than the eyes...

Pic6: Both should be in focus to be perfect. Other wise a great moment and a good enough pic. Would have liked to see it with a 30 degree angel or so. But this is okey.

Pic 7: No expert as I said, but a fill flash would do great. The light behind them is too distracting for me.

Pic8: close up! We only need to see the eyebrows, to the chin I think. Otherwise fine. Again. I see them kissing and I see others kissing. I understand that some pics need to get the atmosphere but it is not these kind of pics I think.

Pic9: Background spoils this one. I would have focussed on her and the three women eager to get married themselves. Her in focus and the rest blurred is really good though. If I only look at those and single them out form the other information in that pic, I actually love it.I miss her legs though.

Pic10: no purpose for this one. I understand that you picture this to see how others shot them etc. A situation. But it is not compelling.

Pic11: flowers  at the back are nice, the kids e  cbehind them again blow this shot for me. But it is difficult. You were at f2 so f1.8 would not have helped a whole lot. I can't say another angle would have been better. Also I am not sure getting closer would have helped with the composition, because the composition of the two is good. It would have made the back ground blurrier. I would have tried to get them in such a way that I could get them and a background of somewhat blurred flowers. But you were not THE photgrapher, so you'll have to take it as it comes I guess.

Pic12: Nothing wrong with this shot that you can help I think. Background is unromantic to me. Again there may have been little choice. A FF cam with a fast lens would have blurred it more I think. The light is not very nice either.

Pic13: get in closer I'd say, mainly because I hate the that background. A steal bridge?? Use f1.4 in these situations so there is some background but we cannot tell it is some awful looking bridge (for a wedding). Again: it seems like the place was not too romantic? More green and trees and flowers in a nice garden would have been nicer and were not helpful to you I think.

Even though I am not feeling to well today hence I can spend some time on this I'll stop here.

Again: correct me if I am wrong, because i am no expert!!

 Loga's gear list:Loga's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Loga
Contributing MemberPosts: 791Gear list
Like?
Re: Oke
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

I can't tell how upset I am, but tomorrow I will try to recreate my reply. This time in local computer first... Grrrrrrr...

 Loga's gear list:Loga's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Jorginho
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,152Gear list
Like?
Had the same once
In reply to Loga, Apr 30, 2013

I think the time you took to reply simply was too long. Was similar with me once.

 Jorginho's gear list:Jorginho's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
timedrun
Contributing MemberPosts: 676Gear list
Like?
Re: Oke, PP some pics (quick and dirty..)
In reply to Jorginho, Apr 30, 2013

I think the extra blurring of the BG improves these Joringho, wedding photos are very agreeable to having this technique as the B and G feel like the day is a blur and it really isolates them as special on their day, and reminds them of the feelings they felt on the day  imo.

Environmental is good too, but often needs to be staged or controlled to include the venue's unique or beautiful elements. the odd  guest/ MOP in the background are a distraction and normally need to be blurred out, especially if they are staring at the camera/gawping.

The throwing of the bouquet looks wierd, but actually not ruined, and there is some mileage in it as an extra to a proper shot in a lot of circumstances having seen the DOF-not-logical look.

all imho.

-- hide signature --

A little green rosetta......a tiny green rosetta........

 timedrun's gear list:timedrun's gear list
Samsung NX20 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 50-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Samsung NX 16mm F2.4 Pancake Samsung NX 45mm F1.8
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Jorginho
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,152Gear list
Like?
Re: Oke, PP some pics (quick and dirty..)
In reply to timedrun, Apr 30, 2013

I agree..quick and dirty..Blew the throwing bouquet actually. But with the colours and getting ris of the clipping highlights and especially getting rid of a large part of the scene I thought I put it up her anyway...

 Jorginho's gear list:Jorginho's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Loga
Contributing MemberPosts: 791Gear list
Like?
My answers :)
In reply to Loga, May 1, 2013

So... after my lost reply yesterday I managed to recreate it, and I cheated the watchdog of the site too. It is not too nice from dpreview not to give the chance to log in again and continue editing your reply...

So!

As I already wrote, you raised up some good points in your post, however, I there are some I can't accept, or I want to reveal the original concept that you may not noticed. Of course, I am just a hobbist, however, I can't accept that except the first picture all of them are just snapshots from a guest. In fact, I did not have a concept, or I did not try to create a whole report as I mentioned in my OP (and that could be the reason why certain moments and moods are missing - as you pointed out). It is true, that I did not wanted to take pictures _as THE photographer_, but as a guest. There were two guys who acted this role, and in most situations I had to take care not to stay in line of fire So maybe it is better to watch my pictures as they are: a series of a guest. But snapshots? A few, but not every of them but one. I checked your edited versions too, in one picture I like the narrower crop (where the bride throws the flowers), but adding PP blur would be a last resort for me. I can't really say I like what you did with the curves, even if had been done dirty and quick: I feel they become artifical as one pointed out too. But it is a good idea to spend more time with PP and try to make them better!

Jorginho wrote:

The Leica has such a lovely bokeh but I see it virtually nowhere.

The 25 1.4 was my least used lens from the three. I prefer the FOV of 14 and 45, and when I shot with the 25 I did not intended to exaggerate its bokeh all the time. You are right, that the 'girl at the bridge' could have more background blur though.

To me more specific, a lot of comments on quite a few pics:

Pic 2: overexposed, I see the car and then, oh wait...I see two people waving. I also see some guy not dressed appropriate for the party (;-)) walking by...The thought is good, the execution not and this pic to me has no place in a nice series of a wedding.

Sure, actually this picture was a request of my girlfriend I told her that it is almost impossible, and it was (exposure differences, reflections). In post-process I tried to get back the original idea, but maybe I could do it better. Anyway, you are right that it can't be part of a serious wedding series. I just thought it is fun.

Pic3. I would focus much more on the girl, zoom in (come closer in the case of primes). The light is too harsh and contrasty with the dark background for my taste. You could have made a lot more of that scene I think

Why? My intention was to show the temple as well. Don't get what's wrong with that. You are right about the light, it is harsh, but in the other hand it emphasizes my modell, and make this picture a good environmental portrait IMHO. So it is OK for _my_ taste.

Pic4: get lots closer and fill this with a flash. The subject is too far away and completely overrun by the light outside. Better to try to be at a 90 degree angle from the light I think. The thought is a good one, an exciting moment entering the church.

No. No way. Here you don't get the idea and the mood. This picture is intended as it is: harsh light from outside, you can intimate the bride but can't see her in details, and wanted to make a contrast between the sunny day outside and the cold and intimate inside of the temple. Maybe you may add a _little_ light to the inside, but not the way you did. That is a completely different picture and has nothing to do with I wanted to tell.

Pic5: What is the subject here? keep the horizon straight or straighten it in PP. Looking at peoples back that are prominent is not very helpful in general. You do this in a pci with dancers too: the main subject is theback. It is like taking a macro of a fly and focussing on its rear end rather than the eyes...

The subject is the _ceremonial_, with the priests and the pair. Somebody must show his/her back, and when I wanted to show the ceremonial with the priest, I think, I did a good choice. There is no such rule that you must _always_ show the front of your subjects. And this is one can be justified _as a part of the whole series_.

Pic6: Both should be in focus to be perfect. Other wise a great moment and a good enough pic. Would have liked to see it with a 30 degree angel or so. But this is okey.

Pic 7: No expert as I said, but a fill flash would do great. The light behind them is too distracting for me.

This time I completely agree. I was not experienced enough to estimate the back light before I ran in front of the pair Anyway, I was nervous to do that and barely dare, because I had to go in between the pair and the priests while the ceremony was going. My hands was shaking, and despite the marvellous IBIS I managed to blur the whole picture So not a perfect picture at all. However, I am sure that no other photographer has this composition, and maybe the pair will enjoy it. Agreed, a heavy post-process is needed here.

Pic8: close up! We only need to see the eyebrows, to the chin I think. Otherwise fine. Again. I see them kissing and I see others kissing. I understand that some pics need to get the atmosphere but it is not these kind of pics I think.

Different opinion here. I like this picture because it's not just a snapshot showing the bride kissing with someone, but in the same picture there is the mother of the bride getting the best wishes as well! (And yes, for the audience outside the event it is just 'I see others kissing too', but for the pair it is a good photo I think). I also like the tree that framing the picture.

Pic9: Background spoils this one. I would have focussed on her and the three women eager to get married themselves. Her in focus and the rest blurred is really good though. If I only look at those and single them out form the other information in that pic, I actually love it.I miss her legs though.

Here your crop is really good. I like it a lot. Thanks for it. In the same time I like the original too. It is maybe a matter of taste here: I like scenes with a lot of space, this is why I prefer the 14mm. The scene you made with crop could have been better taken with the 25 1.4! And the concept of yours is very good!

Pic10: no purpose for this one. I understand that you picture this to see how others shot them etc. A situation. But it is not compelling.

Mhm, okay, I accept this one. As the _eye of a guest_, I think it is okay.

Pic11: flowers  at the back are nice, the kids e  cbehind them again blow this shot for me. But it is difficult. You were at f2 so f1.8 would not have helped a whole lot. I can't say another angle would have been better. Also I am not sure getting closer would have helped with the composition, because the composition of the two is good. It would have made the back ground blurrier. I would have tried to get them in such a way that I could get them and a background of somewhat blurred flowers. But you were not THE photgrapher, so you'll have to take it as it comes I guess.

Pic12: Nothing wrong with this shot that you can help I think. Background is unromantic to me. Again there may have been little choice. A FF cam with a fast lens would have blurred it more I think. The light is not very nice either.

Completely right. The environment was not romantic at all! It was a very ugly coast, with dirty and green water, and buildings and statues back from the '60s, '70s of the socialist culture. Not a good place to take romantic pictures... However it was not my choice 'cos I was not THE photographer.

Pic13: get in closer I'd say, mainly because I hate the that background. A steal bridge?? Use f1.4 in these situations so there is some background but we cannot tell it is some awful looking bridge (for a wedding). Again: it seems like the place was not too romantic? More green and trees and flowers in a nice garden would have been nicer and were not helpful to you I think

And this bridge was the most interesting and appealing background here I found! Imagine the rest... You are absolutely right about the f1.4. The truth is that I did not dare to use it. I was afraid the lens won't be sharp enough, but that was a bad idea. Even if it would have been a little less sharp, blurring the background was more important here.

.

Even though I am not feeling to well today hence I can spend some time on this I'll stop here.

Again: correct me if I am wrong, because i am no expert!!

I did where I felt I have to show my original concepts, thoughts and possibilities. Nevertheless, it was very useful to get your opinions, and watch my arranged photos by you! In the future I will be more brave to use PP background blur if needed. Thank you very much for taking your time, and let me see other concepts, thoughts. It was very useful!

Loga

 Loga's gear list:Loga's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
DonSantos
Senior MemberPosts: 1,122Gear list
Like?
Re: Wedding with OM-D
In reply to Loga, May 1, 2013

From the first image which is very superb I was expecting a great series. Unfortunately the others were not as good. Almost p&s like.

 DonSantos's gear list:DonSantos's gear list
Nikon D600 Sony Alpha 7 Voigtlander 40mm F1.4 Nokton Classic Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads