which white balance do you prefer here?

Started Mar 30, 2013 | Discussions
kev777zero
Senior MemberPosts: 1,476Gear list
Like?
which white balance do you prefer here?
Mar 30, 2013

I played around with white balance the other night to see which setting is better, or more accurate. Which one would you prefer?

Shot with NEX-5R + Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 fisheye

Tungsten

Tungsten -1

AWB appeared too warm to me. Tungsten was closest to actually what I saw, but I prefer the slightly cool Tungsten.

 kev777zero's gear list:kev777zero's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-3 Sony Alpha NEX-5N NEX5R Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Tamron AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) +4 more
NEX5R
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
aodi
Contributing MemberPosts: 719
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to kev777zero, Mar 30, 2013

I agree. Last one.

-- hide signature --

Anatoli

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
forpetessake
Senior MemberPosts: 3,168
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to kev777zero, Mar 30, 2013

The first picture is the only one that looks natural. I would increased saturation of the blue to make the sky stand out.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
S3ZAi
Contributing MemberPosts: 732Gear list
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to forpetessake, Mar 30, 2013

Yeah, first looks best. I think you should adjust it a bit, not go straight to tunsgten, it seems quite unnatural that way.

 S3ZAi's gear list:S3ZAi's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha 7R Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS Sony FE 55mm F1.8
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keit ll
Senior MemberPosts: 2,733Gear list
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to S3ZAi, Mar 31, 2013

I find the comments amusing , they are all unnatural ! I don't like these kind of distorted images they do nothing for me.

-- hide signature --

Keith C

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
S3ZAi
Contributing MemberPosts: 732Gear list
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to Keit ll, Mar 31, 2013

Keit ll wrote:

I find the comments amusing , they are all unnatural ! I don't like these kind of distorted images they do nothing for me.

-- hide signature --

Keith C

Well, we were talking about the colors not about the distortion of shapes. I understand that fisheye isn't everyone's cup of tea, but I don't understand what your comment adds to this topic...

 S3ZAi's gear list:S3ZAi's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha 7R Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS Sony FE 55mm F1.8
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keit ll
Senior MemberPosts: 2,733Gear list
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to S3ZAi, Mar 31, 2013

S3ZAi wrote:

Keit ll wrote:

I find the comments amusing , they are all unnatural ! I don't like these kind of distorted images they do nothing for me.

-- hide signature --

Keith C

Well, we were talking about the colors not about the distortion of shapes. I understand that fisheye isn't everyone's cup of tea, but I don't understand what your comment adds to this topic...

OK my comments were slightly tongue in cheek but they were my opinion & opinions were solicited ?   These forums are of limited value if a variety of opinions cannot be expressed. To my eye this photo could have a perfect WB but would still be uninteresting.

-- hide signature --

Keith C

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
offtraildog
Regular MemberPosts: 178Gear list
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to kev777zero, Mar 31, 2013

I prefer the first with some adjustment to the sky

 offtraildog's gear list:offtraildog's gear list
Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS Sony Alpha NEX-5N Sony a6000 +2 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
uhligfd
Senior MemberPosts: 1,132
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to Keit ll, Mar 31, 2013

If the pictures all had the same luminance or brightness, then the  decision might be more useful ...

As the color shifts to more blue, the shots brighten.

But that was not what we were supposed to notice here, right, nor the distortion of fish-eye.

Sounds like one of those utterly irresponsible political push polls that is designed to pull the rug over us. How bad can we become in our posts? Disgusting manipulation here ...

Remove from forum, please.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
S3ZAi
Contributing MemberPosts: 732Gear list
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to Keit ll, Mar 31, 2013

Keit ll wrote:

S3ZAi wrote:

Keit ll wrote:

I find the comments amusing , they are all unnatural ! I don't like these kind of distorted images they do nothing for me.

-- hide signature --

Keith C

Well, we were talking about the colors not about the distortion of shapes. I understand that fisheye isn't everyone's cup of tea, but I don't understand what your comment adds to this topic...

OK my comments were slightly tongue in cheek but they were my opinion & opinions were solicited ?   These forums are of limited value if a variety of opinions cannot be expressed. To my eye this photo could have a perfect WB but would still be uninteresting.

-- hide signature --

Keith C

Opinions were solicited on white balance, not on anything you could think of. One could at least respect the poster and respond to what he/she asks, even if some questions aren't of our liking or seem to be stupid or whatever.

On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with tongue in cheek, my bad for not getting that.

But still: I believe that if one has to go off topic, at least one should try to be constructive.

I see this happen a lot: There are some people who think of themselves as authorities on photography, or just feel like speaking their mind in which ever way they please and just take every thread they can in a direction of their own. In most cases this is a negative direction, if you want to be noticed, negativity is the best way to go.

But this is just too easy, the hard thing is to try to really have a dialogue with each other. Of course there's no point in policing the forum, except for the most extreme cases, but I believe it is a good thing to try to keep it at least at a well intended dialogue level. Just my 2cents.

 S3ZAi's gear list:S3ZAi's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha 7R Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS Sony FE 55mm F1.8
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Rccarruth
Forum MemberPosts: 54
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to S3ZAi, Mar 31, 2013

I prefer the third.  For a shot like this, I don't think "natural" matters much. I think you could get better results selectively editing colors and maybe using some layering effects, but if you're just adjusting the white balance my vote is for the third.
-Clark

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
danelmix
Regular MemberPosts: 363Gear list
Like?
Re: which white balance do you prefer here?
In reply to kev777zero, Mar 31, 2013

I love the tungsten one. The city off to side has more pop.

 danelmix's gear list:danelmix's gear list
Sony SLT-A99 Sony 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Poweruser
Regular MemberPosts: 381Gear list
Like?
#2 (no text)
In reply to kev777zero, Mar 31, 2013

(no text)

-- hide signature --

aka Pedro Valente

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads