Intel or AMD

Started Mar 18, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
chris49 Forum Member • Posts: 50
Intel or AMD

Hi

I have decided to build a PC that will only be used to produce images. I intend to run Lightroom and Silver FX Pro as my work is now almost always in monochrome.

I will be installing the OS ( sticking with win7 for the time being) and the two program's above on an SSD drive with the  completed images stored on a normal SATA hard drive.

my question is should I go down the intel route ...more expensive .... Or would i not notice a lot of difference if i went the AMD  route. If intel I will be looking at an I5 level processer.

-- hide signature --

Best regards Chris

Osvaldo Cristo
Osvaldo Cristo Veteran Member • Posts: 4,089
No difference

In the day practice it will make no relevant difference for your application.

I am not following the latest technological advances on processor area but historically you had times when Intel had a clear edge on AMD and vice-versa. Apparently we are in the time where Intel has the advantage but if you consider the overall system, other variables as GPU, memory, SSD/HD, and your software will put everything at almost same level if you compare present availabilities.

I went to Intel for my new workstation last year just for the tradition.

Regards,

-- hide signature --

O.Cristo - An Amateur Photographer
Opinions of men are almost as various as their faces - so many men so many minds. B. Franklin

 Osvaldo Cristo's gear list:Osvaldo Cristo's gear list
Olympus Stylus 1030 SW Nikon D200 Nikon D300S Nikon D810 Nikon AF DX Fisheye-Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8G ED +32 more
mfait Contributing Member • Posts: 653
Re: Intel or AMD

I you have some in mind that are in your price range you can compare their performance here:

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

 mfait's gear list:mfait's gear list
Canon PowerShot S100 Canon EOS 450D
gipper51 Veteran Member • Posts: 4,350
Re: Intel or AMD

Right now Intel has a clear-cut lead on the high end processors (i7). AMD is really only competitive on the entry to mid level range. AMD's counterpart to the i5 is the 8 core FX-8350, which is faster in certain multi-threaded benchmarks but slower in most others. In general the i5 is slightly faster in most typical uses for a PC, including photoshop benchmarks. The i5 also draws less power and overclocks extremely well (the K version) if that interests you.

Either one will be sufficient for heavy photo editing when paired with plenty of RAM and a decent SSD.

I'd look at the benchmarks from this review and see which one suits your needs better:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/the-vishera-review-amd-fx8350-fx8320-fx6300-and-fx4300-tested

 gipper51's gear list:gipper51's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Sony Alpha 7R Canon EOS 7D Mark II Tamron AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Sigma 12-24mm F4.5-5.6 II DG HSM +7 more
Scott Eaton Senior Member • Posts: 2,156
same here

>>AMD is really only competitive on the entry to mid level range.

Yeah, I pretty much agree with that. Right now AMD is only keeping in the game by throwing a lot of cores at Intel's better per core efficiency.

For DIY set a price point and see what gives a better bang per buck.

Bouldergramp
Bouldergramp Regular Member • Posts: 337
Re: Intel or AMD

What operating system do you plan to install on this home-build computer?

-- hide signature --

Bouldergramp

 Bouldergramp's gear list:Bouldergramp's gear list
Samsung EX2F +3 more
chris49 OP Forum Member • Posts: 50
Re: Intel or AMD

Thanks for comments.....OS will be win 7

-- hide signature --

Best regards
Chris

nikkorwatcher Contributing Member • Posts: 684
Re: Intel or AMD

Intel usually has better or faster take-up of its enhanced instruction sets which benefit very repetitive bulk processor operations such as the ones useful in media and image processing. You'd have to google it.

Intel is more power efficient for the same workload at the moment.

Rodolfo Contributing Member • Posts: 660
Re: Intel or AMD

I'd ask which chip in each category. The differences within each are greater than those between. Generally, there is a tendency to exaggerate the processing power required to run photo software.

scokill Senior Member • Posts: 2,448
Re: Intel or AMD

i7 3770K $229 at micro center.  Can't be beat for the price IMO.

 scokill's gear list:scokill's gear list
Nikon D610 Nikon Df Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D +1 more
DavidZvi Regular Member • Posts: 135
Re: Intel or AMD

No question, Intel.

AMD is better at the lower end entry level systems, those WITHOUT a dedicated graphics card.  The Trinity APU is very good.  But as soon as you talk a dedicated card it's Intel.  And for 2-D applications the GPU does NOT need to anything special, anything over 100-150 is more than enough, even the AMD APU or Intel HD4000 would actually do. But what you need is at least 4 cores, clock speed and RAM.  16-32gb of RAM.

But the other problem with AMD is the upgrade path.  It's limited.  AND to get the latest CPU on many motherboards you need to be running the latest bios.  And guess what, you need to install an older chip in order to upgrade the bios.  So yes you may need the cheapest lowest $$$ cpu you can find in order to get your latest greatest CPU to work.

So unless you are looking for an office productivity machine, go Intel.

 DavidZvi's gear list:DavidZvi's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Nikon D800 Nikon D750 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR +10 more
edispics
edispics Senior Member • Posts: 2,815
Re: Intel or AMD

I have been building my own PCs for longer than I can remember and I totally agree with the previous comments about buying Intel. Spend some time choosing your motherboard carefully, make sure you have your Sata3 and USB 3 connections. Make sure you have an adequate video card, PS CS6 chokes on some low end cards. Memory is cheap these days, buy as much as you can afford. OCZ and Crucial make good SSDs. If you want a little more bang for your photo storage, take a look at the Seagate Momentus XT hybrid drives - part SSD, part mechanical, very fast, lots of storage. If buying from WD, take a look at the Blacks rather than the Greens. Get a reputable, reliable power supply, don't scrimp. Get a case with really good ventilation. Win 8 has much better memory management. Don't like Metro, no problem, just get Classic Menu from Source Forge, it's free and gives you back your traditional desktop with the start button, and you can still flip into Metro when you want to - best of both worlds. Set up properly with Win 8, a good Intel processor, lots of good high speed memory, and SSDs - these suckers fly. Good luck and enjoy.

chris49 OP Forum Member • Posts: 50
Re: Intel or AMD

Thanks guys that really helps

-- hide signature --

Best regards
Chris

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads