40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?

Started Dec 10, 2012 | Discussions
Pixelhater
Forum MemberPosts: 61
Like?
40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?
Dec 10, 2012

Which is the sharpest of the two? And which is the best?

Oh, Fullframe all the way.

amosf
Contributing MemberPosts: 680Gear list
Like?
Re: 40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?
In reply to Pixelhater, Dec 10, 2012

Seem to be two different sorts of lenses. The 40 is reliable and sharp and very light and compact. Nice fun lens.

the 50 is a macro, albeit just 1:2

You would expect the 50 to be sharper for macro use at least, but I have never used one.

 amosf's gear list:amosf's gear list
Canon EOS 550D Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Tamron AF 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
amosf
Contributing MemberPosts: 680Gear list
Like?
Re: 40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?
In reply to amosf, Dec 10, 2012

From a review. lol.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-50mm-f-2.5-Compact-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx

The Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro Lens is very slightly soft wide open, sharp at f/3.2 and very sharp after f/4-5.6. Color and contrast are very good. Full frame body users will see some vignetting wide open.

 amosf's gear list:amosf's gear list
Canon EOS 550D Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Tamron AF 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
biza43
Senior MemberPosts: 1,986Gear list
Like?
Re: 40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?
In reply to Pixelhater, Dec 10, 2012

Pixelhater wrote:

Which is the sharpest of the two? And which is the best?

Oh, Fullframe all the way.

There is so much more to a lens than sharpness... best for what?

-- hide signature --

www.paulobizarro.com

 biza43's gear list:biza43's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Olympus E-M1 Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2,8/21 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm 1:1.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
oldfartwitha5d
Senior MemberPosts: 1,427
Like?
Re: 40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?
In reply to biza43, Dec 10, 2012

biza43 wrote:

Pixelhater wrote:

Which is the sharpest of the two? And which is the best?

Oh, Fullframe all the way.

There is so much more to a lens than sharpness... best for what?

+1

I actually own both, and it has never occurred to me that one of them is "best", somehow. They are quite different. Despite the similar focal length, they share very few properties, except perhaps the sharpness - they're both very sharp, even from f2.8.

The 50mm f2.5 was released in 1987, while the pancake is a brand new design. AF is precise, but slow and a bit noisy on the 50 f2.5, while the 40mm is rather quick and much more silent. The 50 can focus much closer, of course. It has fewer aperture blades, 6 vs 7 on the 40mm, so your OOF highlights will look a little nicer on the 40mm.

The 40mm is really small and weighs just 130g, the 50 is small and light, too, but cannot compete with the pancake, of course, at more than double the weight, 280g.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
photospots
Regular MemberPosts: 156Gear list
Like?
Re: 40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?
In reply to Pixelhater, Dec 10, 2012

Pixelhater wrote:

Which is the sharpest of the two? And which is the best?

Oh, Fullframe all the way.

Hi

My research has shown the 50/2.5 to be the little bit better, but macro normally is very sharp lenses :

-- hide signature --

/Torben

 photospots's gear list:photospots's gear list
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
elfroggio
Senior MemberPosts: 1,764
Like?
Re: 40/2.8 or 50/2.5 macro?
In reply to Pixelhater, Dec 12, 2012

Pixelhater wrote:

Which is the sharpest of the two? And which is the best?

Oh, Fullframe all the way.

  • Which one is the sharpest? I would tend to say the 50mm macro (from my very limited try at the store)
  • Which one is the best? For what? By far the 40mm f/2.8 and this has almost nothing to do with the optics. When making photos of people, people feel much more relaxed with the 40mm. The camera becomes like a slightly bigger point and shoot. People has much less scared, especially when I explain that I use it in the Professional mode. I use it for indoor portraits and for street photography, and now it's on sale for $150. I paid the full price 3 month ago:-( Good optics and fantastic "cute" factor.
-- hide signature --

Thanks
http://www.foto-biz.com
The Business of Being a Photographer -- Lightroom Q&A

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads