Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

Started Sep 28, 2012 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Jethro777 Regular Member • Posts: 116
Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

My brother, a die-hard Nikon and Canon fan swears by his reviews. Is it credible?

http://www.kenrockwell.com/sony/a55.htm

"Monday Morning Wake-Up Call"

While all the whizzy features impress gadget hounds, the fundamental picture-taking ability of the Sony A55 is flawed in several very important ways. I wouldn't buy one of these things.

Among the big deficiencies for serious photographers, any one of which is a deal-breaker, are:

1.) On-screen junk. I was never able to get the exposure data numbers off of my image so I could compose. Instead of being below the image as on a real SLR, the EVF of this Sony always has some data written on top of your image as you're trying to compose.

2.) Sony is several years behind Nikon and Canon when it comes to basic settings. There is no way to set any green-magenta color trim on any setting except the manual-white-card setting. Worse, one cannot set warm/cool shift on the Auto White Balance setting, which is how I get great images out of my Nikons, and even my Canon point-and-shoots, but something that this Sony can't do. Because of this design defect, all the pictures I took with the A55 were too blue for my taste. Oops!

3.) I never could find how to shift the exposure program. Even Canon's first EOS 620 of 1987 had a shiftable program. Canon is a camera built for photographers, while Sony is better at making electronic baubles.

4.) The Sony A55 puts all sorts of junk files and folders all over the SD card. Not only does this make it a pain to have to hunt and peck for the only folder we need that has our images, half of my computers didn't recognize the card in my various card readers! I had to stick the SD card in my MacBook Pro, and use the MacBook Pro to copy the files to a USB stick, and then copy from the USB stick to my Power Mac. In the A55's defense, the A55 connects to all my computers just fine via USB and pops up as an external drive, which is something the Nikon D7000 can't do. Still, I'd rather the cards were legible!

5.) The images just don't look as good as I get from Canon and Nikon. The "look" of a digital camera, just like the look of a woman or the look of a film, is a very subtle and personal thing. In the case of Canon and Nikon, they've worked decades to fine-tune their image processing algorithms, transfer functions and color matrices to get images that simply look better, to me, than I get from this Sony. Sony makes the sensors for Nikon, but sensors are only a small part of a much larger equation in camera design.

The images from this Sony do have better color than what I get from the LEICA M9, but that's not saying much. Image quality depends more on these subtle factors that aren't familiar to anyone other than camera designers than all the marketing fluff in the world. Nikon and Canon have thrown more resources to this problem for more decades than Sony has. Sony has been a world leader in professional video and electronic imaging since the 1960s, but not in still photography.

-- hide signature --

Since I intend to invest in the A65, I guess my question is, are the concerns general, or was this true of the A55's he was reviewing?

 Jethro777's gear list:Jethro777's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V Sony SLT-A65
Nikon D7000 Sony SLT-A55
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Tubal Contributing Member • Posts: 709
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

Ken Rockwell is a diehard Nikon fanboy.

He might have some good tips on photography, and he might know his stuff, but when he reviews anything besides Nikon, it's pretty biased.

 Tubal's gear list:Tubal's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 Sony SLT-A77 Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G Sony DT 18-70mm F3.5-5.6 +10 more
Amateur Sony Shooter Veteran Member • Posts: 5,417
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?
1

He suggests everyone shoot jpeg only, and low-medium res is good enough. Would you follow his suggestion?

 Amateur Sony Shooter's gear list:Amateur Sony Shooter's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony a77 II Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* +5 more
Bart7D
Bart7D Veteran Member • Posts: 4,226
Re: Ken Rockwell's review is NOT credible

He has a very lighthearted approach to writing reviews about things he knows (which make them often fun to read), but also is over-estimating his knowledge and comprehension of other brands. He sounds firm and decided, but has obviously not taken the time to get a grasp of even basic functions in Sony's Alphas.
The result is moronic nonsense.

Bart

 Bart7D's gear list:Bart7D's gear list
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 Sony SLT-A77 Sony SLT-A99 Sony a77 II +19 more
sensibill
sensibill Veteran Member • Posts: 5,394
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?
3

Jethro777 wrote:

My brother, a die-hard Nikon and Canon fan swears by his reviews. Is it credible?

No. He's a self-promoting tabloid camera blogger and Nikon devotee (paid shill) with a flair for the ridiculous and excessively hyperbolic to garner hits. His approach is akin to a car salesman trying to steer an ignorant mark to the vehicle he wants to sell most. Relevant facts and rational perspective do not play a role.

And speaking of playing a role, anyone who has trouble finding a DCIM folder on an SD card needs to be in another business altogether. I'm sure he gets around the 'clutter' just fine.

Rockwell Translation: It's not a Canikon and does a few things differently; ergo it's crap.

 sensibill's gear list:sensibill's gear list
Nikon 1 J1 Sony Alpha 7 II
(unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 3,992
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

Ken Rockwell is the Father of the RichHigh method.
And by this, I mean he gets his attention by stirring controversy.

Steve Paradise Contributing Member • Posts: 885
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

Perhaps Ken doesn't realize that Nikon uses Sony sensors.

Cyberman Regular Member • Posts: 407
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

There's a video of Ken walking around the B&H store. It's amazing to see someone talk incessantly (and like a machine-gun), yet not saying anything substantive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3S0_7xKOIc

It reminds me of someone I used to work with - great in a job interview situation, but couldn't do the job (although he thought he could, living in a world of his own).

 Cyberman's gear list:Cyberman's gear list
Sony SLT-A99 Sony 50mm F1.4 Sony 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 Sony 100mm F2.8 Macro Sigma 12-24mm F4.5-5.6 II DG HSM +1 more
GuyMcKie Contributing Member • Posts: 600
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

Old man with nostalgia for the past, where everything was better than now.
Digital is better than film, and in pp any film look can be simulated.

thubleau7 Contributing Member • Posts: 516
August 24th 2010

Who cares?
If his reviews are not credible show us something current like a A57 review .

nplanet Regular Member • Posts: 152
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

To quickly answer your question: NO.

Jethro777 OP Regular Member • Posts: 116
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

There is only one response then.

It will make for an interesting 'family debate' then. Thanks for everyone's contributions so far.

 Jethro777's gear list:Jethro777's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V Sony SLT-A65
Promit Senior Member • Posts: 1,983
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

Nothing Ken Rockwell says is EVER credible. He only shoots JPEG and has bizarre film era demands of his equipment. His photos are mediocre and his technical competence is disastrously poor.

 Promit's gear list:Promit's gear list
Sony a77 II Sony Alpha 7R II Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX +11 more
Stflbn Senior Member • Posts: 2,575
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

I guess my question is more toward the OP.

Why are you worrying about a55 reviews when the a57 and better are out there and substantially better camera's than the a55.

 Stflbn's gear list:Stflbn's gear list
Sony a6000 Sony Alpha 7S Sony Alpha 7 II Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony FE 24-70mm F4 OSS +6 more
HobbiesAreFun
HobbiesAreFun Senior Member • Posts: 2,457
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?

There's always an ounce of truth to the spewing crap that comes from his mouth. He's very good at attracting attention, overexaggerating reality, and producing views from a strictly family-photographer perspective. While I don't question he can do great things as a photographer in his own right, much of his "Advice" isn't worth reading.

-- hide signature --

-Eric (17 years old with tons of things I can't wait to learn)
http://eswenson.smugmug.com

 HobbiesAreFun's gear list:HobbiesAreFun's gear list
Nikon D800E Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8 ED-IF Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Nikon AF-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Samyang 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Aspherical +3 more
Neeyon Senior Member • Posts: 1,007
Re: IMHO Ken was waaaaaay too quick to write it off...

If you do google search for A55 reviews you'll see that the vast majority of professional reviews (including DPR's review) are highly positive, not to mention the numerous awards this camera won. I did a lot of research before buying my A55, and off the top of my head, I think that Ken Rockwell's review was the only majorly negative one that I came across from a professional reviewer. There are areas where Ken certainly knows his stuff, but I agree with the others that he seems to have a notable CaNikon bias.

I'm not saying that the A55 doesn't have its flaws (and certainly you'll find them listed in a number of the reviews), but then no camera is perfect. It all comes down to what suits you as an individual. Basically, what are the strengths you need, and what are the flaws you can or can't live with? Personally I find it almost amusing how quickly Ken wrote it off - from the focus he gave to some pretty minor issues (e.g. didn't like the way the camera organised the files on the memory card) it seems like he had decided that he wasn't going to like it before he'd even opened the box. Even his comments about IQ in the conclusion are difficult to understand - he basically says he doesn't like the way the camera's images look, and prefers the way CaNikon images look, but doesn't actually say specifically what it is he doesn't like (though to his credit he does acknowledge that it is a subjective matter). Maybe it didn't suit his photography style or his personal taste in how images should look, but there are tons of photos on the internet (including many from users of this forum) that show that this camera is capable of taking fantastic shots.

As a side note, if you're thinking about buying an A55 (I'm assuming this is the case since you're asking for feedback on this review), I'd recommend looking at an A57 too. So long as you don't need the in-built GPS and don't mind a camera that is a bit chunkier, then it has quite a few incremental improvements over the A55 (e.g. better video capabilities, better EVF etc) and isn't that much more expensive.

 Neeyon's gear list:Neeyon's gear list
Canon PowerShot S100 Sony SLT-A55 Sony 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Sony DT 50mm F1.8 SAM +1 more
Ralf B
Ralf B Veteran Member • Posts: 7,594
don't ruin thanksgiving
12

Jethro777 wrote:

My brother, a die-hard Nikon and Canon fan swears by his reviews.

You may an issue next Thanksgiving here. So if the discussion "Why on Earth did you even consider Sony" should arise, provide your brother with links to other review sites - like the a57 review on this very site - so that your decision has the faintest chance of any credibility...

Since I intend to invest in the A65, I guess my question is, are the concerns general, or was this true of the A55's he was reviewing?

KR is wayyyyy off the mark. I shoot mostly with an a900 in RAW, and my a55's IQ is absolutely satisfactory for the occasions (mountain hikes, motorcycle tours etc) the FF gear is just too heavy to take along. And the a55 "gimmicks" are just great: Here is an example of an in-cam pano (which of course means jpeg) from a motorcycle tour in the French Alps in August 2011:

Shot with the Ttamron 17-50/2.8 with neutral creative style and all in-cam jpeg settings at "0". Some PP (CA removal, levels) yielded a result that works great as large print on the wall. Great shadow details...

Forget KR, get the a65. Good luck with arguing these moves with your brother, though

-- hide signature --
 Ralf B's gear list:Ralf B's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 Sony SLT-A55 Sony 16-35mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* +13 more
tbcass
tbcass Forum Pro • Posts: 23,714
Question; Is Ken Rockwell's review credible? Answer; NO
1

Ken Rockwell doesn't even test the Sony cameras he talks about. He is not a professional photographer. He really doesn't know much about cameras and his articles clearly demonstrate his ignorance and are amaturish at best. He's a Canikon Fanboy with a web site, nothing more.

BTW, the two main points he complained about in that A55 review are not true in the A65. The A65 does have program shift and it has a very sophisticated method for adjusting white balance. The rest of his rant was simply him spouting off his personal opinions. He loves to be provocative to up his web site hit rate. The web site is how he makes his living.

One last think. No offense but does your brother know much about photography? Anybody that takes KR seriously doesn't in my book.
--
Tom

Look at the picture, not the pixels

http://www.flickr.com/photos/63683676@N07/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/25301400@N00/

 tbcass's gear list:tbcass's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony SLT-A77 Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di USD +8 more
tbcass
tbcass Forum Pro • Posts: 23,714
Re: Is Ken Rockwell's review credible?
3

Tubal wrote:

Ken Rockwell is a diehard Nikon fanboy.

He might have some good tips on photography, and he might know his stuff, but when he reviews anything besides Nikon, it's pretty biased.

Know his stuff. I disagree. I probably know more than he does. He's an ignorant ass.

-- hide signature --
 tbcass's gear list:tbcass's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony SLT-A77 Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di USD +8 more
Eleson Senior Member • Posts: 1,191
If Ken says we should drive on the right side of the road , ...

... then I wouldn't dare to get out in traffic, because I certainly don't trust him.

-- hide signature --

Cheers
Erland

 Eleson's gear list:Eleson's gear list
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D Sony SLT-A77 Sony 50mm F1.4 Sony DT 55-300mm F4.5-5.6 SAM Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads