1200 fps is NOT True

Started May 5, 2012 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ItalianEngineer New Member • Posts: 5
1200 fps is NOT True

Video at 1200fps on Nikon J1, is not TRUE!
Real video recording is at 600fps, the camera duplicate every frame!!!!!

I shooted an hi-speed video (1200fps) to my analog oscilloscope,
connect to function generator.

I put on input of oscilloscope a tringolar wave at 1200Hz (exactly at 1198.8Hz=29.97x40),

I shoot that wave, and I note that the effective frame rate is 600fps NOT 1200fps.
( I get 2 periods of wave instead of 1, on every frame recorded)

The camera duplicate all frame inside, and all appear to be at 1200fps, but is not true!
It's simple to check using a digital video editor, like premiere or similar,

or with the camera: in play mode, frame by frame, you can see that every frames are duplicate.
Why Nikon said that this camera can record at 1200fps?
I bought this camera for this features only, and it doesn't works.

All Hi speed camera is very important for industrial video, and for sports analysis,
I have another Camera: Casio Hi-Speed, that works perfectly.

Nikon 1 J1
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
normsmith Veteran Member • Posts: 3,372
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

Interesting - have you tested the slower 400 fps setting? this is the one I use, simply because it plays back at a higher resolution.

I am guessing that for the general shooter, the double framing will not matter as play back remains smooth (i.e. your oscillator picked this up, not your eye. so for most people it is a technical issue that they won't even see rather than a practical one).
--
my blog http://pinkfootstudio.blogspot.com
never more than 3 posts per page so you will not be overloaded with images.

Paul Pasco
Paul Pasco Veteran Member • Posts: 5,068
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

normsmith wrote:

Interesting - have you tested the slower 400 fps setting? this is the one I use, simply because it plays back at a higher resolution.

I am guessing that for the general shooter, the double framing will not matter as play back remains smooth (i.e. your oscillator picked this up, not your eye. so for most people it is a technical issue that they won't even see rather than a practical one).

Yeah but isn't this a form of fraud? I don't care myself but what if somebody bought the camera for this feature?
--
Regards, Paul

Lili's Dad

 Paul Pasco's gear list:Paul Pasco's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 Nikon D50 Nikon D300 Nikon 1 V1 Nikon 1 J1 +15 more
clide Junior Member • Posts: 28
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

Wow, I hadn't done much with 1200 fps, but I just checked some test shots that I did and you are absolutely right.

That is disappointing for several reasons. Not only are they lying about 1200 fps but they are also making the file size unnecessarily bigger by duplicating each frame. They could have done 600 fps at a slightly higher resolution if they weren't going to really do 1200 fps.

Have you tried to contact Nikon about this?

normsmith Veteran Member • Posts: 3,372
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

I am guessing that they need the higher frame rate to provide a relatively useful period of slow motion footage that is sufficient to tell a story - the demands on the camera and memory must be quite staggering. It works in principle and seems to be a balancing act between frames taken and playback speed to get an acceptable result.

I think this has to be seen within the context of a £400 - £600 consumer product that is delivering something already quite advanced (with more development needed to improve it in the future to get higher resolution and longer footage) and that is designed to give the 'man in the street' a powerful feature - it is what it is. I have used it and enjoyed the results.
--
my blog http://pinkfootstudio.blogspot.com
never more than 3 posts per page so you will not be overloaded with images.

clide Junior Member • Posts: 28
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

Yes, but it is still entirely dishonest and misleading to advertise it as 1200 fps when it is actually only recording 600 unique frames per second. That's like taking a 1080 30p file duplicating every frame and calling it 60p. Yes it may technically be encoded as 60p, but it's giving you the exact same information as the 30p file.

I am aware that bandwidth and high speed memory limitations that make this kind of high speed video difficult, but the nearly 5 year old Casio EX-F1 could do 1200 fps and was actually able to deliver.

Bruce McL Senior Member • Posts: 1,185
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

clide wrote:

... That's like taking a 1080 30p file duplicating every frame and calling it 60p.

Or it's like taking an image from a 2MP sensor, enlarging it in the camera to 4MP, and advertising the camera as having 4 megapixels. I expect to see the word "interpolated" added if that is done.

myzel Senior Member • Posts: 2,075
Re: problems with that test

ItalianEngineer wrote:

I put on input of oscilloscope a tringolar wave at 1200Hz (exactly at 1198.8Hz=29.97x40),

I shoot that wave, and I note that the effective frame rate is 600fps NOT 1200fps.
( I get 2 periods of wave instead of 1, on every frame recorded)

To me this sounds a lot like a problem with the Nyquist frequency. With a 1200 fps sampling rate it should only be possible to completely capture a frequency of 600 hz.

And btw, does the display of your oscilloscope really have a refresh rate of 1200 hz?

A better test, in my opinion, would be capturing a slower wave (for example a pendulum, and not a wave form on a monitor) and then measuring the angle between the frames. This angle can be used to calculate the time between the frames and therefore the fps.

 myzel's gear list:myzel's gear list
Nikon 1 V1 Nikon 1 Nikkor 10mm f/2.8 Nikon 1 Nikkor 18.5mm f/1.8 Nikon 1 Nikkor 32mm f/1.2
olyflyer
olyflyer Forum Pro • Posts: 23,919
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

ItalianEngineer wrote:

Video at 1200fps on Nikon J1, is not TRUE!
Real video recording is at 600fps, the camera duplicate every frame!!!!!

I shooted an hi-speed video (1200fps) to my analog oscilloscope,
connect to function generator.

I put on input of oscilloscope a tringolar wave at 1200Hz (exactly at 1198.8Hz=29.97x40),

I shoot that wave, and I note that the effective frame rate is 600fps NOT 1200fps.
( I get 2 periods of wave instead of 1, on every frame recorded)

The camera duplicate all frame inside, and all appear to be at 1200fps, but is not true!
It's simple to check using a digital video editor, like premiere or similar,

or with the camera: in play mode, frame by frame, you can see that every frames are duplicate.
Why Nikon said that this camera can record at 1200fps?
I bought this camera for this features only, and it doesn't works.

All Hi speed camera is very important for industrial video, and for sports analysis,
I have another Camera: Casio Hi-Speed, that works perfectly.

If you are right about this, then this is a scandal and a fraud. I'll think about how to test this properly, I am not sure your test is the right way, but it definitely needs to be double checked before considering it a fraud by calling the camera 1200fps.

clide Junior Member • Posts: 28
Re: problems with that test

myzel wrote:

To me this sounds a lot like a problem with the Nyquist frequency. With a 1200 fps sampling rate it should only be possible to completely capture a frequency of 600 hz.

And btw, does the display of your oscilloscope really have a refresh rate of 1200 hz?

That only applies if he was capturing the value of the wave at 1200hz, in this case he is capturing the entire wave by taking a picture of it, so he could even capture higher frequencies.

The oscilloscope refresh rate is a concern, but you can take a video of absolutely anything moving quickly at 1200fps and see for your self that each frame is duplicated.

The only other concern would be if they were adding the frames to slow down the play-back rate but still recording 1200fps. This can easily be tested by filming a clock with a second hand. You'll find that the resulting video which is being played back at 30 fps takes 40 seconds between each tick of the clock. 30x40=1200. So they are indeed counting those duplicated frames in the 1200 fps figure.

ItalianEngineer OP New Member • Posts: 5
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

400fps Works Properly.

I did a lots of tests, the last test with analogue oscilloscope confirm this problem.

I did another test, I put a disc with black and white radial stripes on an electric motor,
and I take a video ad 1200fps.
Result: Every Frame is duplicate!

I suppose 2 things:

1) It was a bug in the firmware (the J1 have 2 processor; may be the firmware copy the same frame from one processor only). A solution is possible.

2) For some reasons it's impossible to recording at 1200fps, maybe bandwith limit, or time to compress each frame; and this is a "workaround" waiting for next model, because in this case, there is NO solution.

I did contact Nikon about 2 months ago,
they wrote me, that problem exists!!, And they will work on new firmware.
I post this message, because I don't want to wait more.

Jimmy jang Boo Senior Member • Posts: 1,951
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

ItalianEngineer wrote:

I did contact Nikon about 2 months ago,
they wrote me, that problem exists!!, And they will work on new firmware .

That's good news. Hopefully the new FW fixes many (if not all) the previously addressed issues.

 Jimmy jang Boo's gear list:Jimmy jang Boo's gear list
Nikon 1 V1 Nikon 1 J5 Nikon 1 Nikkor VR 10-30mm f/3.5-5.6 Nikon 1 Nikkor VR 30-110mm f/3.8-5.6 Nikon 1 Nikkor 10mm f/2.8 +3 more
Johannes Zander Regular Member • Posts: 276
Re: 1200 fps is NOT True

Nikon 1 V1-Firmware-Update 1.12 available. Fixes 1200 fps frame duplication.

 Johannes Zander's gear list:Johannes Zander's gear list
Nikon 1 V1 Nikon D800 Olympus E-M1 Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED +20 more
Seppi Evans Junior Member • Posts: 49
New Firmware 1.12 released!
1

An issue that caused some frames to be duplicated in slow-motion movies recorded at a Frame rate setting of 1200 fps has been resolved.

 Seppi Evans's gear list:Seppi Evans's gear list
Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)
wlad Senior Member • Posts: 1,486
Re: New Firmware 1.12 released!

LOL, so much for the conspiracy about fake features and stuff

ItalianEngineer OP New Member • Posts: 5
Re: New Firmware 1.12 released!

Where we can find the 1.2 firmware version?
On Nikon support site the latest firmware version is A:1.11 / B:1.10

olyflyer
olyflyer Forum Pro • Posts: 23,919
Good news!

Seppi Evans wrote:

An issue that caused some frames to be duplicated in slow-motion movies recorded at a Frame rate setting of 1200 fps has been resolved.

Excellent news. Hopefully the new firmware includes some other documented and undocumented improvements. I’ll be downloading it tonight.

What this confirms in my opinion is that Nikon did not abandon the N1 and takes it seriously. I don't care much about the 1200fps thing, for me it is just a technical challenge to check that it is rally 1200 individual frames, but what is important that Nikon did something about the N1 and not just leave it as it is.

olyflyer
olyflyer Forum Pro • Posts: 23,919
It was not fake, but not working as expected...

wlad wrote:

LOL, so much for the conspiracy about fake features and stuff

Well, it confirmed that the feature was not working as expected. Good that Nikon took care of the problem, I never thought there was any conspiracy and was quite sure it was an error. Nikon is not know to have deliberately committing fraud, claiming something which is fake, but perhaps threads like these and the mail conversations one can have with them is not really wasted time after all. If an error is found we must let them know otherwise it might not be considered as an error and never detected/corrected.

olyflyer
olyflyer Forum Pro • Posts: 23,919
Re: New Firmware 1.12 released!

ItalianEngineer wrote:

Where we can find the 1.2 firmware version?
On Nikon support site the latest firmware version is A:1.11 / B:1.10

You don't mean it was faked news...?

clide Junior Member • Posts: 28
Re: Good news!

Just tested it out and it is fixed. Makes 1200fps much smoother (and more usable from a technical standpoint).

That's good news that it was just a firmware bug. I suspect that this update was pushed out on its own so it could be taken care of quickly. Many countries take false advertising claims very seriously and this one was easily demonstrated to be 'not as advertised'. Interesting how they worded it as "An issue that caused some frames to be duplicated" when in fact it was all frames being duplicated.

Thanks for pointing it out ItalianEngineer, and thanks for fixing it Nikon.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads