New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

Started Mar 16, 2012 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
oscarvdvelde Contributing Member • Posts: 863
New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

DPreview hasn't published the news yet, but Zeiss did announce their new 15mm f2.8 with built-in hood and a filter thread of 95mm.

https://www.facebook.com/carlzeisslenses
http://blogs.zeiss.com/photo/en/?p=1520

and the first images with it:

http://www.thephoblographer.com/2012/03/16/review-zeiss-15mm-f2-8-canon-ef-mount/

It is probably expensive.
--
Weather & Photography
http://www.lightningwizard.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightningwizard

 oscarvdvelde's gear list:oscarvdvelde's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 Samyang 12mm 1:2.0 NCS CS Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR Fujifilm XF 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR +1 more
hotdog321
hotdog321 Forum Pro • Posts: 15,434
Re: New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

Looks like a magnificent lens--what you would expect from Zeiss. But it sure looks like it experiences massive vignetting at f/2.8.

 hotdog321's gear list:hotdog321's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Canon EF 11-24mm F4L +1 more
oscarvdvelde OP Contributing Member • Posts: 863
Re: New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

Vignetting seems Zeiss' weakness in their wide angles.

Note that http://www.thephoblographer.com mentions the price....

"If you’re out there making money from your landscapes and architecture, then I want to tell you to go search around the internet for pre-orders (ships in May), get your credit card in hand, and purchase this lens for $2,948.00"

All of a sudden it feels even better to own my Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 with low vignetting, AF, and good sharpness at 16mm f/2.8 at less than 1/3rd the price.

Or consider a Samyang 14mm f/2.8 which does have strong distortion and vignetting but at only 1/7th of the Zeiss price. Or a EF 14mm f/2.8L II at about 2/3rds of that price with a 5 cm closer focusing distance and autofocus. Or a Nikon 14-24mm which gives you more focal lengths and AF for free.
If I wanted to spend this kind of money I'd rather get a Canon TS-E 17mm.
--
Weather & Photography
http://www.lightningwizard.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightningwizard

 oscarvdvelde's gear list:oscarvdvelde's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 Samyang 12mm 1:2.0 NCS CS Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR Fujifilm XF 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR +1 more
hotdog321
hotdog321 Forum Pro • Posts: 15,434
Re: New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

Me too! That 17 looks pretty sweet.

 hotdog321's gear list:hotdog321's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Canon EF 11-24mm F4L +1 more
Mike K Veteran Member • Posts: 5,525
Re: New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

typical Zeiss colors, and really sharp in the corners.

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2012/20120316_2-Zeiss15Distagon-samples.html

 Mike K's gear list:Mike K's gear list
Canon EOS-1D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS D60 Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM +9 more
oscarvdvelde OP Contributing Member • Posts: 863
Re: New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

Mike K wrote:

typical Zeiss colors, and really sharp in the corners.

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2012/20120316_2-Zeiss15Distagon-samples.html

Beautiful. I really like diglloyd.com, it's one of the very few lens reviewers who actually present wonderful photographs instead of bookshelves!

 oscarvdvelde's gear list:oscarvdvelde's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 Samyang 12mm 1:2.0 NCS CS Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR Fujifilm XF 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR +1 more
technic Veteran Member • Posts: 8,932
lenstip.com sample images

hmm ... the sample images at lenstip look far from convincing at the wider apertures, even f/5.6 has a very blurry border. From first impression worse than the 10x cheaper Samyang 2.8/14. Let's hope for Zeiss that lenstip got a 'bad copy' ...

Tim Devine
Tim Devine Senior Member • Posts: 1,186
Re: lenstip.com sample images

Something has to be wrong with their lens....or 5D III. This is a real outlier from the other samples I've seen. The shots in Lloyd Chambers review (requires subscription) are gorgeous. Here are a few more that don't look anything like the lenstip samples.

http://www.zeissimages.com/showreplies.php?qid=873
http://www.kenrockwell.com/zeiss/slr/15mm-f28.htm

Here's a review in Spanish, doesn't have samples but has a resolution chart.

http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-15-mm-f-2-8-rendimiento.html

-Tim

 Tim Devine's gear list:Tim Devine's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R Sony FE 35mm F2.8 Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sigma DP1 Merrill Canon EOS 5D +17 more
Ben_Egbert Forum Pro • Posts: 20,228
Re: lenstip.com sample images

I kept wanting Rockwell to compare it to a 17TSE. That's the gold standard Canon UWA, not the 14.

Anyway, I am jazzed by this lens, but wow, what a price.

Tim Devine wrote:

Something has to be wrong with their lens....or 5D III. This is a real outlier from the other samples I've seen. The shots in Lloyd Chambers review (requires subscription) are gorgeous. Here are a few more that don't look anything like the lenstip samples.

http://www.zeissimages.com/showreplies.php?qid=873
http://www.kenrockwell.com/zeiss/slr/15mm-f28.htm

Here's a review in Spanish, doesn't have samples but has a resolution chart.

http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-15-mm-f-2-8-rendimiento.html

-Tim

-- hide signature --

What I see when I open the image and view it at 100% is very important to my overall attitude toward a final print. When I look at the print I know what’s there and what I had to do to get there. For me, good enough does not work.

http://ben-egbert.smugmug.com/

Ben

 Ben_Egbert's gear list:Ben_Egbert's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Samyang 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Aspherical +1 more
joger
joger Veteran Member • Posts: 3,098
Re: lenstip.com sample images

Ken Rockwell????

You're gotta be kidding!!

Mr. Rockwell has some nice ideas. I truly respect hi efforts to maintain the site and his family business (that he always states at the end of the blog)

His conclusions are most of the time very much emotional and rather seldom technically correct. This style works pretty well with Top Gear and cars where nobody expects a real test but with lenses and other photo gear I need a rigorous analyses and tests the proof mtf curves and/or test charts.

So of you really want to know that the lenses can do please use lens tip.co. photo zone.de or the-digital-image.com or slrgear.com

I own the TS-E 17 and Ken's comment that Canon has ho sharp wide angle lens is truly wrong - Canon is the only company that has a ultra wide angle tilt and shift lens which absolutely stand out - almost no distortion and superb sharpness across the frame - even fully shifted!

I normal stitch four frames fully shifted and get a virtual 11 mm lens on FF - the images are tack sharp till the end of the image circle - the only reason to stay with Canon these days (unfortunately)

So if you are looking for the ultimate ultra wide angle lens go for the maybe best UWA on this planet - the TS-E 17.

And please don't trust Mr. Rockwell - his assumptions and conclusions are most of the time best case funny - he seriously stated, that analog film is better then digital - that might have been true four years ago but today the 5D II blows even medium and large format film away - very sad indeed but proven by many sources including myself

Here are some shots with the TS-E 17 fully shifted (a bit bigger then stamp sized):

Ben_Egbert wrote:

I kept wanting Rockwell to compare it to a 17TSE. That's the gold standard Canon UWA, not the 14.

Anyway, I am jazzed by this lens, but wow, what a price.

Tim Devine wrote:

Something has to be wrong with their lens....or 5D III. This is a real outlier from the other samples I've seen. The shots in Lloyd Chambers review (requires subscription) are gorgeous. Here are a few more that don't look anything like the lenstip samples.

http://www.zeissimages.com/showreplies.php?qid=873
http://www.kenrockwell.com/zeiss/slr/15mm-f28.htm

Here's a review in Spanish, doesn't have samples but has a resolution chart.

http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-15-mm-f-2-8-rendimiento.html

-Tim

-- hide signature --

What I see when I open the image and view it at 100% is very important to my overall attitude toward a final print. When I look at the print I know what’s there and what I had to do to get there. For me, good enough does not work.

http://ben-egbert.smugmug.com/

Ben

-- hide signature --

isn’t it funny, a ship that leaks from the top

ISO 9000 definition of quality: 'Degree to which a set of inherent characteristic fulfills requirements'
I am the classic “Windows by Day, Mac by Night user'

“The horizon of many people is a circle with zero radius which they call their point of view.” Albert Einstein

 joger's gear list:joger's gear list
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM Canon EOS 5D Mark II +14 more
Ben_Egbert Forum Pro • Posts: 20,228
Re: lenstip.com sample images

I have the 17TSE and also the 24TSE which is no slouch. Did you see my post about a 14TSE? I also linked your trick for stitching, which I have already tried and like if tilt is not required for DOF.

joger wrote:
Ken Rockwell????

You're gotta be kidding!!

Mr. Rockwell has some nice ideas. I truly respect hi efforts to maintain the site and his family business (that he always states at the end of the blog)

His conclusions are most of the time very much emotional and rather seldom technically correct. This style works pretty well with Top Gear and cars where nobody expects a real test but with lenses and other photo gear I need a rigorous analyses and tests the proof mtf curves and/or test charts.

So of you really want to know that the lenses can do please use lens tip.co. photo zone.de or the-digital-image.com or slrgear.com

I own the TS-E 17 and Ken's comment that Canon has ho sharp wide angle lens is truly wrong - Canon is the only company that has a ultra wide angle tilt and shift lens which absolutely stand out - almost no distortion and superb sharpness across the frame - even fully shifted!

I normal stitch four frames fully shifted and get a virtual 11 mm lens on FF - the images are tack sharp till the end of the image circle - the only reason to stay with Canon these days (unfortunately)

So if you are looking for the ultimate ultra wide angle lens go for the maybe best UWA on this planet - the TS-E 17.

And please don't trust Mr. Rockwell - his assumptions and conclusions are most of the time best case funny - he seriously stated, that analog film is better then digital - that might have been true four years ago but today the 5D II blows even medium and large format film away - very sad indeed but proven by many sources including myself

Here are some shots with the TS-E 17 fully shifted (a bit bigger then stamp sized):

Ben_Egbert wrote:

I kept wanting Rockwell to compare it to a 17TSE. That's the gold standard Canon UWA, not the 14.

Anyway, I am jazzed by this lens, but wow, what a price.

Tim Devine wrote:

Something has to be wrong with their lens....or 5D III. This is a real outlier from the other samples I've seen. The shots in Lloyd Chambers review (requires subscription) are gorgeous. Here are a few more that don't look anything like the lenstip samples.

http://www.zeissimages.com/showreplies.php?qid=873
http://www.kenrockwell.com/zeiss/slr/15mm-f28.htm

Here's a review in Spanish, doesn't have samples but has a resolution chart.

http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-15-mm-f-2-8-rendimiento.html

-Tim

-- hide signature --

What I see when I open the image and view it at 100% is very important to my overall attitude toward a final print. When I look at the print I know what’s there and what I had to do to get there. For me, good enough does not work.

http://ben-egbert.smugmug.com/

Ben

-- hide signature --

isn’t it funny, a ship that leaks from the top

ISO 9000 definition of quality: 'Degree to which a set of inherent characteristic fulfills requirements'
I am the classic “Windows by Day, Mac by Night user'

“The horizon of many people is a circle with zero radius which they call their point of view.” Albert Einstein

-- hide signature --

What I see when I open the image and view it at 100% is very important to my overall attitude toward a final print. When I look at the print I know what’s there and what I had to do to get there. For me, good enough does not work.

http://ben-egbert.smugmug.com/

Ben

 Ben_Egbert's gear list:Ben_Egbert's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Samyang 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Aspherical +1 more
Tim Devine
Tim Devine Senior Member • Posts: 1,186
Re: lenstip.com sample images

Well, mine's on order. I've never used the 17TSE (have used the 24TSE II though) but I know it's a great lens. I'm slowly building a nice collection.

Ben_Egbert wrote:

I kept wanting Rockwell to compare it to a 17TSE. That's the gold standard Canon UWA, not the 14.

Anyway, I am jazzed by this lens, but wow, what a price.

Tim Devine wrote:

Something has to be wrong with their lens....or 5D III. This is a real outlier from the other samples I've seen. The shots in Lloyd Chambers review (requires subscription) are gorgeous. Here are a few more that don't look anything like the lenstip samples.

http://www.zeissimages.com/showreplies.php?qid=873
http://www.kenrockwell.com/zeiss/slr/15mm-f28.htm

Here's a review in Spanish, doesn't have samples but has a resolution chart.

http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-15-mm-f-2-8-rendimiento.html

-Tim

-- hide signature --

What I see when I open the image and view it at 100% is very important to my overall attitude toward a final print. When I look at the print I know what’s there and what I had to do to get there. For me, good enough does not work.

http://ben-egbert.smugmug.com/

Ben

 Tim Devine's gear list:Tim Devine's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R Sony FE 35mm F2.8 Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sigma DP1 Merrill Canon EOS 5D +17 more
Dan_168 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,177
Re: lenstip.com sample images

Ben_Egbert wrote:

I kept wanting Rockwell to compare it to a 17TSE. That's the gold standard Canon UWA, not the 14.

Me too love to see the comparison between the TSE 17 and the new Zeiss 15, but can we request to see that from some other reviewer instead please? :)...... I will see how much longer i can resist to go get one myself to play with it and do the comparison myself against my other UWA such as the 14-24G, Samyang 14 and TSE 17 and Zeiss 21, I like both of my TSE 17 and TSe 24II, but I love my Zeiss 21 even more when it comes to color and local contrast, and this new Zeiss 15 looks just as impressive as the 21.

upnorthfar Regular Member • Posts: 492
Re: lenstip.com sample images

Not that I have anything against the 14 TSE idea, but like that one the Zeiss is again without filter thread and quite heavy. We have so many special lenses but no regular ones in UWA range. I wish Canon made sharp light weight 20/2.8 and 17/3.5 without bulging front element. I guess the market for these is quite small and they have to be made special/expensive.

Ben_Egbert wrote:

I have the 17TSE and also the 24TSE which is no slouch. Did you see my post about a 14TSE? I also linked your trick for stitching, which I have already tried and like if tilt is not required for DOF.

Khun_K Contributing Member • Posts: 764
Re: New: Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8

I have to say I am a Zeiss fan and have more than 40 of varies Zeiss lenses, but for this one, I will simply pass, Canon TS-E 17/4L is simply more flexible in many ways.

oscarvdvelde wrote:

DPreview hasn't published the news yet, but Zeiss did announce their new 15mm f2.8 with built-in hood and a filter thread of 95mm.

https://www.facebook.com/carlzeisslenses
http://blogs.zeiss.com/photo/en/?p=1520

and the first images with it:

http://www.thephoblographer.com/2012/03/16/review-zeiss-15mm-f2-8-canon-ef-mount/

It is probably expensive.
--
Weather & Photography
http://www.lightningwizard.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightningwizard

 Khun_K's gear list:Khun_K's gear list
Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) Phase One Capture One Pro
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads