E-M5 Negatives

Started Mar 12, 2012 | Discussions
Sergey Borachev
Senior MemberPosts: 2,511Gear list
Like?
E-M5 Negatives
Mar 12, 2012

Hi, All.

So far, after the early hands-ons, previews, and reviews, there is no show stopper yet.

The only negatives mentioned, which may or may not be important to you, are:

  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

  • not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.

  • too small for the best positions of dials and controls.

  • the hump, looking ugly to some people

  • not as good as GH2 in video.

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?

Sergey

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
dgrogers
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,652
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Sergey Borachev wrote:

Hi, All.

So far, after the early hands-ons, previews, and reviews, there is no show stopper yet.

The only negatives mentioned, which may or may not be important to you, are:

  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

I prefer it this way.

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

I'm not convinced focus peaking is the holy grail others do. If I'm using manual focus it's because I don't trust the camera to determine the best focus in the first place.

  • not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.

Perhaps, but differences in IQ won't be noticeable the majority of the time.

  • too small for the best positions of dials and controls.

We'll see. Haven't touched it yet myself so i don't know if it will be a problem or not.

  • the hump, looking ugly to some people

The hump makes the camera.

  • not as good as GH2 in video.

Don't care about video. If there was no read out distortion or if the camera was capable of taking high speed video for super slow motion, I might feel differently but not much.

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?

It looks like I can.

-- hide signature --

Completely infatuated with the "OMG"

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
MAubrey
Senior MemberPosts: 1,498Gear list
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

I'm a little confused. I didn't see any negatives in your list...


--
--Mike

 MAubrey's gear list:MAubrey's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Sony Alpha 7 Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Voigtlander 58mm F1.4 Nokton SL II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
nzmacro
Veteran MemberPosts: 9,065Gear list
Like?
One worries me a little there
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Sergey Borachev wrote:

Hi, All.

So far, after the early hands-ons, previews, and reviews, there is no show stopper yet.

The only negatives mentioned, which may or may not be important to you, are:

  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

  • not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.

  • too small for the best positions of dials and controls.

  • the hump, looking ugly to some people

  • not as good as GH2 in video.

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?

Sergey

Howdy Sergey.

One there would worry me and its not one I believed would change the way I shoot and thats Peaking. So now being used to it and exactly what it does for the longer MF lenses, personally I would pass on the Oly. If the GH3 doesn't have it either, then the same would apply. So for me, it would be a deal breaker, just a personal thing that I really use a lot and it works for me.

The other interesting one is IQ. With bird shots we tend to crop a fair bit, so having a larger sensor certainly helps with that and still retaining feather details. Again, thats just a personal thing. Still be interesting to see how those fine details would hold up with the new Oly. Time will tell I guess.

All the best Sergey.

Danny.
...........................
m4/3 macro
http://www.macrophotos.com/g2macro

m4/3 feathered flying gadgets
http://www.macrophotos.com/avian/avian.html

Worry about the image that comes out of the box, rather than the box itself.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Chris_R
Regular MemberPosts: 328
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

I prefer a small separate flash, I like the hump, I will get used to the controls, I don't think the IQ will look much different on a 16x20 print. I don't do much video and I have manually focused for the last 40+ years and am sick of it. So yes I can live with it

Chris

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
lsrmz
Regular MemberPosts: 424Gear list
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Sergey Borachev wrote:
Hi, All.

So far, after the early hands-ons, previews, and reviews, there is no show stopper yet.
The only negatives mentioned, which may or may not be important to you, are:

flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.
No problem. I rarely use popup flash anyway.

no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,
never used focus peaking, so it's not one of my must-haves.

not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.
Maybe, but frankly, I can't tell the difference a lot of the time.

too small for the best positions of dials and controls.
Don't know. But I guess I'll find out.

the hump, looking ugly to some people
I don't mind the hump.

not as good as GH2 in video.

My video needs are pretty basic- shooting snippets of my kids' school functions or parties. Considering I used to have a camera which shot video that became a pixelated mess when viewed full-screen, I'm happy with what I've seen from the E-M5.

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?
Yes, I think I can.

Lori

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Tim in upstate NY
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,120Gear list
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Sergey Borachev wrote:

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?

. . . The only thing I can't live with is waiting for another month before I get it.

 Tim in upstate NY's gear list:Tim in upstate NY's gear list
Olympus PEN E-PL3 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
CrashE3
Contributing MemberPosts: 820
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

The only negatives mentioned, which may or may not be important to you, are:

  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

I tend to use off camera flash and larger on camera flashes. I have never used a built in flash. They are not that great.. so why bother?

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

Until the E-M5 was announced and all of the crying about it's lack of this feature began.. I had never even heard of "focus peaking". Still not sure that I understand what it is or what it does.. but because I have made it through 10 years of photography without it.. I am quite sure it is not a feature I would notice if it was not included.

  • not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.

I know what system I bought. If you are a m4/3 user.. you know what system you bought. The IQ is better than most pixel peeping members of these forums will ever need.

  • too small for the best positions of dials and controls.

I don't like the placement of the button over the little thumb grip thingy... but if that is the only thing I can come up with to hate about it, I am still buying one.

  • the hump, looking ugly to some people

Really? I mean.. REALLY?!?!

  • not as good as GH2 in video.

I use video as often as I do built in flash so it is just as important to me.

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?

Not only can I live with it, I am sure to have a wonderful relationship until I meet and run off with her sister! Or maybe her mother. Looking for a cougar cam that can handle my long lens.

Sergey

-- hide signature --

Visualize Whirled Peas.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
lowincash
Contributing MemberPosts: 711
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Nothing on your list is really a negative for me. Only thing I will miss is focus peaking as I'm pretty used to it on the NEX-7 with legacy lenses. However, with the E-M5 being a stabilized body I should have no problem using the magnified view. On the NEX-7 when I want to fine tune the focus, I use the magnify view and the image is very shaky and jumpy. Also, in the magnified view I can't really see the focus peaking much. I'm going to miss this feature but nothing I can't live with.

Actually I was so used to focus peaking, when I used my SRT101 I had trouble focusing when I'm not wearing my glasses lol

Sergey Borachev wrote:

Hi, All.

So far, after the early hands-ons, previews, and reviews, there is no show stopper yet.

The only negatives mentioned, which may or may not be important to you, are:

  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

  • not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.

  • too small for the best positions of dials and controls.

  • the hump, looking ugly to some people

  • not as good as GH2 in video.

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?

Sergey

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
duke_goulden
New MemberPosts: 22
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to lowincash, Mar 12, 2012

The only negatives I can think of are price and the lack of a control wheel on the back of the camera(instead there are 4 buttons). The price is annoying because for the price of the camera and grip I could buy an Nex7 and my Panasonic G3 was only $400, doesn't seem like it's going to be 3 times better...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
TrapperJohn
Forum ProPosts: 10,423
Like?
It's a digital camera. It doesn't produce negatives.
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Couldn't pass that one up.

Onboard flash - I never use the ones I have.

Focus peaking - only on NEX, and it doesn't have squat for glass. There are questions about it's accuracy, anyway.

IQ difference? Not much, pretty much not discernable under ISO800.

The whole point of it is that it is small.

The hump. Seriously, that's a problem?

Don't really care about video.

The only complaint I have about the EM5 is that I don't have one yet. Okay, maybe the goofy name - should have been the OM-D1.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Lohani
Regular MemberPosts: 225
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012
  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

Fine by me

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

I only mf for zone focussing anyways

  • not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.

But I get everything smaller, so that's fair

  • too small for the best positions of dials and controls.

But there ARE more dials, so me likey

  • the hump, looking ugly to some people

Eh, not a fan,but it looks better than external attached. Wish it were off hybrid type

  • not as good as GH2 in video.

shrug. Not a video guy really

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Michael Kaufman
Senior MemberPosts: 2,603Gear list
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to dgrogers, Mar 12, 2012

dgrogers wrote:

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

I'm not convinced focus peaking is the holy grail others do. If I'm using manual focus it's because I don't trust the camera to determine the best focus in the first place.

I've never used focus peaking, so this is completely theoretical, but my understanding is that its not for when you don't trust the camera, its for when you are using MF lenses, and for when you want to confirm exactly where the camera is focusing.

I can imagine it might be useful if I was using zone focusing. It might be nice to have a confirmation that things I thought were in focus were actually in focus. Like I said, I have never used it, so I am not positive it works this way. It also might get in the way of my composing to have all those lines on all the time.

Net-net, it would have been fun to play with, but I think I'll be fine without it.

 Michael Kaufman's gear list:Michael Kaufman's gear list
Fujifilm X100S RX100 III Olympus E-M1 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8 +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Michael Kaufman
Senior MemberPosts: 2,603Gear list
Like?
Internal flash vs External
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Sergey Borachev wrote:

  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

Of all of the negatives you mention, this is the only one that concerns me at all. I would much prefer to have some sort of low power flash built in. I very rarely use a flash, so I am unlikely to have the external one with me on the rare occasions I would like to use it.

 Michael Kaufman's gear list:Michael Kaufman's gear list
Fujifilm X100S RX100 III Olympus E-M1 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8 +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Andr2
Regular MemberPosts: 219
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

No Negatives for me.

Preferences, Yes.

I would have preferred the Black a little bit less Black and the Grey...well it's just a little too Grey.

Other than that it's seems to be just about perfect for me.

All the best...Andre

-- hide signature --

André

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Boneoh
Regular MemberPosts: 171
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Tim in upstate NY, Mar 12, 2012

LOL - I'm with you on that one. It's gonna be a while...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
John Mason
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,631Gear list
Like?
got confused by OP for a moment
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

EM5 negatives? The em5 won't take negative film.

Well, that was my first thought. But I'm from another era.

Anyway, that list of minor negatives is not a concern.

The hump holds the evf where it should be, in the middle instead of off to the side.

Focus peaking in a Nex with all the shaking without IS when you zoom in, I'll take the IS anytime.

Flash, people still use flash? I suppose for light fill light. I've got built in flash on the E5 but it doesn't clear the SHG lenses so I can't use it anyway.

Shutter button placement, chrome not being real chrome on metal coating like my OM1 is (I ordered a black EM5), size being too small so will require getting the grips bumping the price up are my only potential nit pics and they are minor.
--
John Mason - Lafayette, IN

http://www.fototime.com/inv/407B931C53A9D9D

 John Mason's gear list:John Mason's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Uncle Albert
Regular MemberPosts: 139
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Tim in upstate NY, Mar 12, 2012

Agreed.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
David247
Senior MemberPosts: 2,406Gear list
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to Sergey Borachev, Mar 12, 2012

Sergey Borachev wrote:

  • flash not built in, but there is one in the box, free and splash proof.

Never met a pop-up flash that I liked. Used some in "rare emergency situations" a few times but generally never cared for the results. Plus a pop-up flash would greatly complicate the weather sealing process at a crucial point. Give me the included water sealed add on please, that and my FL-36 with stofen diffuser will better meat my needs and desires.

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

Never seen it, never tried it, but from the descriptions I've read not a deal killer. Survived 45+ year without it, so no big deal.

  • not as good in IQ as some cameras with larger sensors.

Well if absolute detail is the problem, I'll use a different camera, and it won't be APS-C sensor. The Nikon D800 looks nice for those extreme detail situations. Otherwise if I shoot with a kit, I want it small light, fast and flexible. So far, the IQ looks very good to me. Much more then satisfactory.

  • too small for the best positions of dials and controls.

Unknown, but from what I see, I don't think so. In fact from the brief handling reviews, I don't really remember any complaints from people who have handled it. For a small camera it looks like they did a very good job with the controls.

  • the hump, looking ugly to some people

Ugly? Not to me. But then I grew up with cameras with humps. Admittedly, in photos it looks a little out of proportion but as long as everything works, that is irrelevant. Prefer the OMD hump to no hump at all.

  • not as good as GH2 in video.

Don't know yet if that is real or not. No side by side comparisons. I think that is more conjecture then reality. It may not have as many "features" as the GH2 but so far I haven't seen anything factual to indicate that it is worse in any way. In fact, the video shot by Robin Wong's friend Sanjit, looks pretty darn good at 1080P http://fullcirclepix.com/blog/ despite YouTube's heavy handed compression artifacts. It looks good enough for my meager video needs.

Can you live with them, considering your requirements in a camera like this?

Yep, absolutely, no doubt. No deal killers there at all. In fact, I don't think there were any I would really call negatives.

-- hide signature --
 David247's gear list:David247's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Olympus E-510
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
nzmacro
Veteran MemberPosts: 9,065Gear list
Like?
Re: E-M5 Negatives
In reply to David247, Mar 12, 2012

David247 wrote:

  • no focus peaking feature, just magnified image for manual focusing,

Never seen it, never tried it, but from the descriptions I've read not a deal killer. Survived 45+ year without it, so no big deal.

Same here David.....or AF, or OIS/IBIS, or EVF, or video, etc, etc ;).

Sorry I lied, 44 years

All the best David.

Danny.

...........................
m4/3 macro
http://www.macrophotos.com/g2macro

m4/3 feathered flying gadgets
http://www.macrophotos.com/avian/avian.html

Worry about the image that comes out of the box, rather than the box itself.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads