Lightroom camera profile - big difference

Started Jun 14, 2011 | Discussions
duncsuss
Contributing MemberPosts: 891
Like?
Lightroom camera profile - big difference
Jun 14, 2011

I discovered there is a big difference between "Adobe Standard" and "Camera Standard" in the Lightroom develop module Camera Calibration : Profile setting. (I expect this is also true in the Photoshop ACR module since they use the same engine.)

To illustrate, here are 2 versions of the same photo, the only difference in development settings being this choice of Profile.

I selected the white balance using the dropper tool on the 4th gray patch, between "40" and "50" in the bottom row, of the QPcard in the first version. When I used the eyedropper on the second pic, the resulting value was almost identical, so I just went with the same as the first pic.

Note the color shift in the iris behind the QPcard -- I'd been struggling to get the true purple of the iris in the photos I'd taken, no amount of tinkering with the white balance seemed to fix it.

Now I know to use the Camera Standard profile. Who would've thought that Pentax could do a better job than Adobe at processing Pentax color?

Using the Adobe Standard profile:

Using the Camera Standard profile:

-- hide signature --

Duncan

kevinschoenmakers
Contributing MemberPosts: 637
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

Oh that's quite a find - keen to try this myself now. Thanks!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Aex
Aex
Regular MemberPosts: 399
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

I guess I'm kinda the same but different.

I created a profile for my K-5 to churn out pleasant-to-look-at heck-care-about-correctness color profile for my travel pics. Shared it with some of my mates (created versions for K-x/r/7/20D) and they seem to be quite happy about it.

Befores (left) and afters (right)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/testdasi/5782708564/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/testdasi/5777307542/

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Plakanina
Contributing MemberPosts: 673Gear list
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

duncsuss wrote:

I discovered there is a big difference between "Adobe Standard" and "Camera Standard" in the Lightroom develop module Camera Calibration : Profile setting. (I expect this is also true in the Photoshop ACR module since they use the same engine.)

I must be left behind somewhere. In my Lightroom (2.7 camera raw 5.7) under 'camera calibration' next to profile is only one option 'embedded'.

I do like what I see on yours and the other post, more contrast and color saturation. Mine are always rather flat.

 Plakanina's gear list:Plakanina's gear list
Ricoh GR Pentax K-5 II Pentax smc FA 43mm F1.9 Limited HD Pentax-DA 20-40mm F2.8-4 ED Limited DC WR
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
RedFox88
Forum ProPosts: 21,617
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

I myself use "camera neutral" for my Canon camera. I'd rather build in my own contrast relative to what the RAW data can handle than to start with a good amount of contrast to being with.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Meuh
Senior MemberPosts: 2,043Gear list
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to RedFox88, Jun 14, 2011

I only have adobie standard in mine.
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31735225@N02/

 Meuh's gear list:Meuh's gear list
Samsung GX-10 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Pentax K-5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Pentax smc DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
bricko
Regular MemberPosts: 296
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to Meuh, Jun 14, 2011

I believe the photo file has to be RAW to have a choice other than EMBEDDED. Check the HELP files in LR 3.4 . I pulled up jpeg and that is all there is to pick from. I dont shoot RAW so dont have any to check with. The HELP files seem to point in that direction.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
narddogg81
Contributing MemberPosts: 969
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

Yep, its very useful. I ran across that feature a while back while trying to get the correct color i remembered on a flower petal. It too was a purple flower, and nothing i did could make it not look blue, until i picked the camera profile. Sometimes adobe standard looks better, but I have modified my preferences in LR to start with camera standard and go from there. I find my colors are more accurate now.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Meuh
Senior MemberPosts: 2,043Gear list
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to bricko, Jun 14, 2011

I shoot raw, and with other cameras I was able to select different profiles but not with my k5.

bricko wrote:

I believe the photo file has to be RAW to have a choice other than EMBEDDED. Check the HELP files in LR 3.4 . I pulled up jpeg and that is all there is to pick from. I dont shoot RAW so dont have any to check with. The HELP files seem to point in that direction.

 Meuh's gear list:Meuh's gear list
Samsung GX-10 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Pentax K-5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Pentax smc DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Success
Regular MemberPosts: 218
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to Meuh, Jun 14, 2011

Meuh wrote:

I shoot raw, and with other cameras I was able to select different profiles but not with my k5.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/31735225@N02/

This is my experience, too. Also, I don't think "embedded" is even supposed to be available on RAW files, but it is. Don't exactly know what embedded would mean on a RAW file.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Edvinas
Senior MemberPosts: 2,807Gear list
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

duncsuss wrote:

Now I know to use the Camera Standard profile. Who would've thought that Pentax could do a better job than Adobe at processing Pentax color?

Both Camera Standard and Adobe standard profiles are created by Adobe, not Pentax.
If you want to see Pentax color, shoot DNG and use Embedded profile.

-- hide signature --

Edvinas

 Edvinas's gear list:Edvinas's gear list
Nikon D3S Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
steephill
Veteran MemberPosts: 8,952
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to Edvinas, Jun 14, 2011

You can also extract the embedded profile from a DNG to ceate a new profile to use with PEF.

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
eadrian75
Regular MemberPosts: 405Gear list
Like?
use embedded
In reply to Success, Jun 14, 2011

Success wrote:

Meuh wrote:

I shoot raw, and with other cameras I was able to select different profiles but not with my k5.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/31735225@N02/

This is my experience, too. Also, I don't think "embedded" is even supposed to be available on RAW files, but it is. Don't exactly know what embedded would mean on a RAW file.

If you have the option to do so then use embedded. This is the profile PENTAX camera (or other camera) embeds into it's raw files. This option will not be available if your camera does not embed its profile into raw files.

Also, don't forget to select "enable profile corrections" under Lens Corrections > Profile tab of Lightroom 3. It should automatically detect your lens and make appropriate corrections.

Not sure if it makes a difference, but i shoot/capture to DNG.

 eadrian75's gear list:eadrian75's gear list
Fujifilm X100S Sony Alpha 7
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Edvinas
Senior MemberPosts: 2,807Gear list
Like?
My K-7 comparison
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

To my eyes, Camera Standard is way off. Adobe Standard is better, Embedded has best skin tones, hair colour (closest to reality).

-- hide signature --

Edvinas

 Edvinas's gear list:Edvinas's gear list
Nikon D3S Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
duncsuss
Contributing MemberPosts: 891
Like?
from the Adobe Help documentation ...
In reply to Edvinas, Jun 14, 2011

Thanks for all the suggestions on how to get even better colour results; obviously, I can't go back and re-shoot all my PEFs as DNGs, and I suspect converting PEF to DNG is not going to result in more useful information than the PEF itself contains.

I'm using Lightroom 3.4.1 on a Mac - it may be different in your system.

Adobe Standard These profiles significantly improve color rendering, especially in warm tones such as reds, yellows, and oranges, from earlier Adobe camera profiles. The Profile pop-up menu displays only one Adobe Standard profile for your camera.

Camera Matching These profiles attempt to match the camera manufacturer’s color appearance under specific settings. Use a Camera Matching profile if you prefer the color rendering offered by your camera manufacturer’s software. Camera Matching profiles include the prefix Camera in the profile name.

Embedded Indicates that the current file (a TIFF, JPEG, or PSD photo) has an embedded profile.

-- hide signature --

Duncan

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
duncsuss
Contributing MemberPosts: 891
Like?
Re: My K-7 comparison
In reply to Edvinas, Jun 14, 2011

Edvinas wrote:

To my eyes, Camera Standard is way off. Adobe Standard is better, Embedded has best skin tones, hair colour (closest to reality).

I've double checked, "embedded" does not exist in the PEF files from my K10D so that isn't an option in this case.

The iris was purple. Adobe Standard rendered it blue, unless I cranked the color temperature so high the other colors went bad.

The lesson I draw from this is simply that the choices exist, and it may be worthwhile looking at the different results before spending a lot of time attempting to WB the image.

-- hide signature --

Duncan

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Edvinas
Senior MemberPosts: 2,807Gear list
Like?
K-5 Adobe standard vs Embedded
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

Very close IMHO.

-- hide signature --

Edvinas

 Edvinas's gear list:Edvinas's gear list
Nikon D3S Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Meuh
Senior MemberPosts: 2,043Gear list
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to steephill, Jun 14, 2011

Thank you ill go do that now

steephill wrote:

You can also extract the embedded profile from a DNG to ceate a new profile to use with PEF.

-- hide signature --
 Meuh's gear list:Meuh's gear list
Samsung GX-10 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Pentax K-5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Pentax smc DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Edvinas
Senior MemberPosts: 2,807Gear list
Like?
Sorry, that was flawed comparison, different WB
In reply to Edvinas, Jun 14, 2011

This is correct one:

-- hide signature --

Edvinas

 Edvinas's gear list:Edvinas's gear list
Nikon D3S Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
David Bourke
Regular MemberPosts: 466Gear list
Like?
Re: Lightroom camera profile - big difference
In reply to duncsuss, Jun 14, 2011

I am interested in this because I just shoot a series of Lacrosse photos in jpeg, and the dark blue jerseys came out purple rather than blue. I have noticed this in the past with a colleague's blue shirt. I don't have this problem using Adobe created profiles, but I find the sky color in Adobe Standard to be too cyan and the Camera Standard to be too saturated. Of course it is easy to adjust these.

-David Bourke

 David Bourke's gear list:David Bourke's gear list
Pentax K-5 Pentax smc DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited Pentax smc DA 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED Pentax smc DA 55-300mm F4.0-5.8 ED Pentax smc DA 21mm F3.2 AL Limited +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads