D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?

Started Apr 20, 2009 | Discussions
powerdog
Regular MemberPosts: 196
Like?
D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
Apr 20, 2009

After lots of reading, I'm pretty familiar with the relative strengths of each. What tipped the balance toward the Nikon for you?

Gatordaze
Junior MemberPosts: 32
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

AF speed and accuracy. I shoot sports only and the 5D2 is only marginally better than the 40D from an AF perspective. If the 5D2 had the 1D3's AF and FPS it would be a killer sports camera and probably called a 1D4! The other reason I like the D700 is the lower MP's I shoot 1200+ images per game and really don't want the big files that the 5D2 produces.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Ms Barb
Contributing MemberPosts: 742
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

I don't have a D700, but I do have a D70, D300 and a D3. When I purchased the D300 and D3, I never considered Canon for two reasons:

1. I already had Nkon equipment including lenses that would not work on a Canon.

2. My new FX Nkon lenses are better than the Canon counterparts so why would I want to go down in quality?

-- hide signature --

Barb
thru the lens and into the world~~

http://www.allenpix.smugmug.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
PhotoGo
Senior MemberPosts: 1,688
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to Gatordaze, Apr 20, 2009

Gatordaze wrote:

AF speed and accuracy. I shoot sports only and the 5D2 is only
marginally better than the 40D from an AF perspective. If the 5D2
had the 1D3's AF and FPS it would be a killer sports camera and
probably called a 1D4! The other reason I like the D700 is the lower
MP's I shoot 1200+ images per game and really don't want the big
files that the 5D2 produces.
--

I don't know this but surely you can turn down the size of the images in the 5D2.

-- hide signature --

PhotoGo

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
andy stelling
Regular MemberPosts: 167
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

Had Canon for 5 years and slowly lost confidence in the products.Chose D700 on the merits of the very usable high ISO s.I live in the uk where light levels are low most of the year, also i shoot the odd wedding where the inside church shots will be non flash and needing ISO s of 2000+

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Thale
Junior MemberPosts: 46
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

I choose the D700 for its DR, especially in the shadows, even at high isos.

Pixels only matter when you print very large, otherwise it's more like a "geek feature"

Thibaud
--
http://www.thale-photo.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Michael F Bann
New MemberPosts: 9
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

I seriously considered the 5DMKII
Given I have been a Canon user for a long time - -
And have a mess of lenses and flashes and - all the stuff you need to do work...

I bought a D700 and am glad I did - the focusing is spot on and fast -

Exposures seem better to me right out of the camera as compared to my EOS 1DII and I am most pleased with the Nikon flash system.

I may pick up a 5DMKII, when I can afford it and they get under $2K even if that means a lightly used one -

But not before that -
--

http://www.bannphotography.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
powerdog
Regular MemberPosts: 196
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to Michael F Bann, Apr 20, 2009
-- hide signature --

I get the sense that D700 wins on build quality, too.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Krishna Das
Contributing MemberPosts: 736
Like?
Focus speed
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

I had a 5D (mk1) before. I got tired of the slow and inacurate focus. Took a leap of faith into the Nikon camp and I'm glad I did.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Kuvasauna
Contributing MemberPosts: 738
Like?
no (nt)
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009
-- hide signature --

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it is not open.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Peter Mueller
Contributing MemberPosts: 505Gear list
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

powerdog wrote:

After lots of reading, I'm pretty familiar with the relative
strengths of each. What tipped the balance toward the Nikon for you?
--

At the time I bought the D700, there was no 2Dii to be considered. Also I already had some $6000 spent on lenses, which fit the D700 marvelously but would not work on the Canon. In addition, I like and very much prefer the Nikon ergonomics (my wife and a good friend of mine shoot Canon so I am familiar with both systems). So, no, I never even considered buying a Canon camera before ordering my D700.

 Peter Mueller's gear list:Peter Mueller's gear list
Nikon D700 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D ED-IF Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D ED-IF Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G +25 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
p0tempkin
Contributing MemberPosts: 648
Like?
Very briefly...
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

...until I realized how feature poor the 5D2 is for a photographer

Double the shutter lag and mirror blackout of the D700
Ancient AF array from the original 5D
AEB limited to 3 frames (vs. 9 for the D700)
+ - 2EV exposure compensation (vs. + - 5EV for the D700)
No AF assist lamp
No built-in Speedlight
No built-in wireless flash commander
No built-in intervalometer

Ancient battery-grip design (requires the removal of the in-camera battery and door)
4FPS vs. 5/8FPS on the D700
Sub-par auto-ISO mode
Low-ISO noise
Sub-par weather sealing
More high-ISO noise than the D700
Sub-par evaluative metering
Very questionable quality control thus far

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Doug Pitts
Senior MemberPosts: 2,089
Like?
Re: Very briefly...
In reply to p0tempkin, Apr 20, 2009
-- hide signature --

....no.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
jimr
Forum ProPosts: 11,090
Like?
See This...Definitive Statement...
In reply to Doug Pitts, Apr 20, 2009

From http://www.dcresource.com
Canon 5D Mark II Full Test

"All things considered, the Canon EOS-5D Mark II is a very impressive digital SLR. For the Canon enthusiast who wants to step up to a full-frame body, it's an excellent choice. I'm not quite sure that it's the ideal camcorder replacement, due to the lack of continuous AF when you're recording a movie. I've spent time with all three of the "budget" full-frame D-SLRs, and I'd place the Mark II second on my list. My favorite camera in this class is the Nikon D700, with its slightly better photo quality, faster continuous shooting, more elaborate autofocus system, and built-in flash (though it lacks a movie mode). But honestly, whichever of these cameras you choose, you can't really go wrong -- they're all excellent."

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
DanielBan
Regular MemberPosts: 231
Like?
Came down to...
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

the faster, more accurate AF of the D700. I need rapid AF in low light (dance performances, concerts, indoor sporting events) with good burst speed. I looked long and hard at the Canon, but in the end, it's novelties couldn't compensate for what it lacked (for my purposes).
--
Nikon D300/D700

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Pascal04
Contributing MemberPosts: 501Gear list
Like?
Re: D700 owners: did you consider Canon 5D2?
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

Chose Nikon over canon for the following:

  • Nikon Flash System - this is a big one for me

  • High ISO noise levels

  • the colors from the D700 were more to my liking. Canon colors need some work

  • 14-24mm f2.8 and 24-70mm f2.8 (then again, canon has that nice f1.2 glass)

  • The D700 is more to my tastes - from a controls/buttons standpoint

The onyl advantage I see with the 5D2 is the higher resolution - just a matter of time before Nikon meets or exceeds that with it's next generation SLR.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
photoforfun
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,084
Like?
Yes...
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009

Because of its silent mode, video mode and the fantastic 24-105 IS lens.

But, owning a couple of nikon lenses and a bit of accessories, it would have been very strupid to change while within a year from now there will be a nikon that has all strenhghts of the D700 and 5DMkII together, and more...
--
Kindest regards,
Stany
http://www.fotografie.fr/

I prefer one really good picture in a day over 10 bad ones in a second...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
AshMills
Contributing MemberPosts: 810Gear list
Like?
Considered canon on swap from Oly
In reply to photoforfun, Apr 20, 2009

Tried all the Canons when I changed from Olympus. Just prefered the Nikon, in every way.

-- hide signature --
 AshMills's gear list:AshMills's gear list
Nikon D700 Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
GSK
GSK
Forum MemberPosts: 99
Like?
returned my 5Dmkll
In reply to AshMills, Apr 20, 2009

Had both D700 and 5Dmkll. Sent back 5Dmkll and am selling all my Canon gear. Still did not like the chroma noise Canon produces.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
pierre1
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,472
Like?
With over 10K invested in Nik. lenses it was never an option.(nt)
In reply to powerdog, Apr 20, 2009
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads