35mm 1.4 vs 2.0 or wait for mark II?

Started May 8, 2012 | Discussions thread
tz9pz2
Regular MemberPosts: 106Gear list
Like?
Re: 35mm 1.4 vs 2.0 or wait for mark II?
In reply to Toranaga, 1 week ago

Toranaga wrote:

mevbo wrote:

Toranaga wrote:

I dont see how they could improve much on the 35L, but i guess the could find some reason to call it mkII and double the price...

I will say that the current 35L is amazing. The first copy I had was not really sharp at wider than f2. My second one is pretty sharp even at f1.4.

I agree, the 35L is amazing. I have heard only rumors about a replacement and even if they turn into something, it would be over a year before it hit the shelves and as mentioned, would be double $. If you have a body that does MA, you will be happey with the 35L. Mine needs +5, but it is fabulous there.

I have never done any adjustments on any of my lenses og bodys....

I've never had a lens that I didn't need to adjust. Except amazingly the 40mm pancake.

 tz9pz2's gear list:tz9pz2's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow