Micro Four Thirds Focal Reducer Shootout

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
brian
Senior MemberPosts: 1,003
Like?
Re: Micro Four Thirds Focal Reducer Shootout
In reply to s_grins, 5 months ago

s_grins wrote:

Brian, out of topic I have a question to you:

There are front mount wide angle lenses that reduce FL. In what way your back mount focal lens reducers are different?

Thanks in advance

Regards

S.

-- hide signature --

Camera in bag tends to stay in bag...

Wide angle front attachments do decrease the focal length like a focal reducer does.  The main advantage of this type of attachment is that doesn't require that your main lens have extra covering power.  In other words, the image circle diameter of the main lens is not changed.  Also, this type of attachment is very useful for creating anamorphic lenses, but that's a very specialized application.

Against this advantage are the following disadvantages:

1) Rear focal reducers increase lens speed, while front attachments do not.

2) Good rear focal reducers increase MTF, while front attachments invariably do not.

3) Rear focal reducers are extremely compact, and in fact they reduce the length of the system, while front attachments are very bulky and make the system much bigger.

4) Good rear focal reducers can be used with almost any SLR lens, while front attachments are restricted to a narrow range of lenses.

5) Good rear focal reducers don't impact the focusing performance of the main lens, while front attachments can introduce significant aberrations as focus is changed.

-- hide signature --

Brian Caldwell

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow