What's wrong with the Quattro

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
unknown member
(unknown member)
Like?
Another one who can't read
In reply to RitterRunkel, 2 months ago

maple wrote:

Agree with Kendall. Nothing's wrong with Q's, just different.

P has finer details with smoother tonal transition. M has greater micro contrast that makes distant subjects look being closer, thus more vivid, though not necessarily natural.

It seems that both images could benefit from finer sharpening. 1 pixel at 100% seems a lot, for Q and M. But I'm no expert in pp.

That's what I'm thinking as well. But it's difficult to see anything here, since one has to compare images after USM with 1px @ 100% ... Both images are pretty f*cked up due to PP and not worth close consideration.

No pp in the first image apart from USM, as mentioned in my post. Minimal pp in the second pic, including USM.
F****d up??

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow