Mirrorless & DSLR Weight Comparison

Started Jul 9, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
unknown member
(unknown member) Contributing Member • Posts: 969
Re: Mirrorless caught in the middle - smaller, but not small enough
1

brownie314 wrote:

Greg A A wrote:

Most people can carry a DSLR just as easy as an M43. The issue comes when you want a camera to put in your pocket. An M43 with lens just isn't small enough. A compact like an RX100iii is a much better complement to a DSLR. That's where I'll spend money for the next upgrade.

-- hide signature --

f8 and be there

I don't know about m4/3 but if you are willing to go with a larger sensor, I had the EOS M and 22mm f/2 in pocket last night.

That EOS M is an interesting camera because it's actually small enough to fit in a pocket. At $495 (2 lens kit and flash) with a larger sensor the M just as good as the RX100iii in image quality and is less expensive. The savings in cost and size seems to be a benefit of omitting the EVF. The M2 is only sold in Asia. I see rumors of a new EOS M3 for later this year.

-- hide signature --

f8 and be there

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
T3
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
T3
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
T3
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow