Mirrorless & DSLR Weight Comparison

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
unknown member
(unknown member)
Like?
Re: Mirrorless caught in the middle - smaller, but not small enough
In reply to brownie314, 4 months ago

brownie314 wrote:

Greg A A wrote:

Most people can carry a DSLR just as easy as an M43. The issue comes when you want a camera to put in your pocket. An M43 with lens just isn't small enough. A compact like an RX100iii is a much better complement to a DSLR. That's where I'll spend money for the next upgrade.

-- hide signature --

f8 and be there

I don't know about m4/3 but if you are willing to go with a larger sensor, I had the EOS M and 22mm f/2 in pocket last night.

That EOS M is an interesting camera because it's actually small enough to fit in a pocket. At $495 (2 lens kit and flash) with a larger sensor the M just as good as the RX100iii in image quality and is less expensive. The savings in cost and size seems to be a benefit of omitting the EVF. The M2 is only sold in Asia. I see rumors of a new EOS M3 for later this year.

-- hide signature --

f8 and be there

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow