Mirrorless & DSLR Weight Comparison

Started Jul 9, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
pannumon Contributing Member • Posts: 741
Re: Mirrorless caught in the middle - smaller, but not small enough

Greg A A wrote:

Most people can carry a DSLR just as easy as an M43. The issue comes when you want a camera to put in your pocket. An M43 with lens just isn't small enough. A compact like an RX100iii is a much better complement to a DSLR. That's where I'll spend money for the next upgrade.

-- hide signature --

f8 and be there

Let's say you can carry DSLR just as easy as µ4/3, but with µ4/3 you carry two more lenses, with a bit less low-light-ability / less shallow depth-of field and EVF instead of OVF. Especially, you don't carry DSLR lenses in your pocket. You have a point there, if you want to keep your camera in pocket, m4/3 is not for you, unless you have GM1.

 pannumon's gear list:pannumon's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Panasonic Lumix G Vario HD 14-140mm F4-5.8 OIS Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH +12 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
T3
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
T3
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
T3
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow