Mirrorless & DSLR Weight Comparison

Started Jul 9, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Contributing MemberPosts: 612Gear list
Re: Mirrorless caught in the middle - smaller, but not small enough
In reply to Greg A A, Jul 9, 2014

Greg A A wrote:

Most people can carry a DSLR just as easy as an M43. The issue comes when you want a camera to put in your pocket. An M43 with lens just isn't small enough. A compact like an RX100iii is a much better complement to a DSLR. That's where I'll spend money for the next upgrade.

-- hide signature --

f8 and be there

Let's say you can carry DSLR just as easy as µ4/3, but with µ4/3 you carry two more lenses, with a bit less low-light-ability / less shallow depth-of field and EVF instead of OVF. Especially, you don't carry DSLR lenses in your pocket. You have a point there, if you want to keep your camera in pocket, m4/3 is not for you, unless you have GM1.

 pannumon's gear list:pannumon's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Panasonic Lumix G Vario HD 14-140mm F4-5.8 OIS +15 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow