Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Veteran MemberPosts: 8,795Gear list
Re: Corner tests for 16-35 f/4 vs. 16-35 f/2.8 (v.1) vs. 24-70 f/2.8L II
In reply to hotdog321, 6 months ago

hotdog321 wrote:

Impressions: the new Canon 16-35 f/4 lens is head and shoulders better than my old 16-35 f/2.8 version 1. The centers of all three lenses are similar at f/4, but the corners of the new 16-35 f/4 are just phenomenal! Sharpness, resolution, color fringing, resistance to flare make the old 16-35 look sick and are frankly better than my fabulously expensive 24-70 f/2.8L II, which is kinda depressing.

thanks for reporting! Yes, the new 4/16-35 is so much better than the old f/2.8 version (or the 4/17-40). But compared to the 2.8/24-70 I'm not so sure, seems to me that the 24-70 has sharper details except maybe in the extreme corners. But my impression might be skewed because the focus plane for the two lenses is slightly different, and there is a difference in contrast or exposure (flare resistance, vignetting?).

 technic's gear list:technic's gear list
Canon EOS 450D Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow