Are you smarter than a 55-300? For this Bigmos, the answer is no.

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
PhotoHawk
Contributing MemberPosts: 657
Like?
Re: Are you smarter than a 55-300? For this Bigmos, the answer is no.
In reply to paulkienitz, 3 months ago

paulkienitz wrote:

My Sigma 150-500 arrived today, and I promptly took it out to the wetland. I haven't gotten a video pan head yet, so I took a monopod. And though a few shots looked kind of nice in uncropped form...

as soon as you crop it, things start looking pretty dire.

Admittedly, the lens was nearly wide open that time, and closing up to f8 does significantly reduce that glowy halo effect, but it still isn't often that you get a sharp shot. This avocet is probably the single clearest cropped shot of the day (click to see 100% zoom):

whereas most shots were a lot poorer than that. This is a typical example of one that's sorta okay and not as messed up as a lot of them were... and it's a blurry mess.

I tried running through the apertures, from f6.3 to f11. I tried running through shutter speeds from 1/500 to 1/8000. Finally I tried manual focus and nudging the ring (which is very nicely damped) a millimeter at a time. Nothing helped.

Later, at home, I set up a focus calibration and ended up with a correction of -2 or -3, which wasn't a very significant difference.

My reason for buying this lens was because I hoped that it would enable me to go further and do more than I can with the little DA 55-300. But it can't. It's nowhere near adequate for such a purpose. I think it may actually be worse than the old 135-400 I sold years ago! That's a lens that no one misses now that it's gone, yet I got along reasonably well with it for some time, and only gradually decided that it just wouldn't do. With this one, I'm seeing major inadequacies right from the start.

So, is this lens decent and I'm missing something or not giving it a fair chance, or is it as bad as I think? Right now I'm thinking I should immediately start proceedings to return it. Am I making sense?

(Unfortunately, I already scuffed the hood by dropping it in gravel.)

It's amazing how truly difficult it is to find an affordable lens that improves on the 55-300. At this point, I guess my only remaining option if I want to stay within a normal human sized budget is DA*300 + TC, but even that adds up to about double the cost of the Bigmos.

-- hide signature --

"A good photograph is knowing where to stand." -- Ansel

Hi Paul;

You might not be in its sweet spot.  If you haven't already have a look at lenstip.com.  Your lens is not particularly good at its long end.  But in the center its best fstop at 370-500mm is f11.  Its best fstop under 250 is f8.  For the corners f11 appears to be a good setting but in general the corners are not great from 370mm on and pretty questionable at 500mm at any fstop.  But I think it may not be any great shakes above 370.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow