Why does this subsection still exist?

Started 2 months ago | Questions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
calson
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,315
Like?
Why does this subsection still exist?
2 months ago

I understand when there was the D2x and the D300 why the differentiation between "pro" and "non-pro" DX cameras. But since 2010 there have been cameras like the D5200 and D7000 that were far better cameras than these "pro" DX cameras in almost every respect.

I had the D2x, D3, D300 and all their predecessors, and now have the D800e and the D7100 cameras. The IQ from the D7100 surpasses all of these DX cameras by a wide margin. It produces images at ISO 3200 that compare well to those from the D3 and the D800e. Autofocus with telephotos and teleconverters is noticeably better with the D7100 than with any of these other cameras.

So what really constitutes a "pro DX" camera at the present time?

ANSWER:
This question has not been answered yet.
Nikon D2X Nikon D3 Nikon D300 Nikon D5200 Nikon D7000 Nikon D7100 Nikon D800E
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow