Nikon 70-300 VR vs Nikon 70-200 f/4 VR

Started Feb 28, 2013 | Discussions thread
Junior MemberPosts: 42Gear list
Re: Nikon 70-300 VR vs Nikon 70-200 f/4 VR
In reply to JurassicPizza, 11 months ago

JurassicPizza wrote:

. It makes me want Nikon to make a 24-70 f/4 of comparable quality (better than the 24-120), because the 2.8 is such a beast of a lens!

Yes to this! The 2.8s are a bit too much for me in price and weight, but an updated F4 "trinity" would be awesome.

I considered the 70-300 (both Nikon and tamron) before settling on the 70-200/4. It's amazing. I had the 2.8 VRII for a short time before the AF went out, and I don't miss it.

 theJrod's gear list:theJrod's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon D7100 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED-IF +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow