Nikon vs. Tamron 70-200mm Questions
I am really sorry to bring this one up again but I would appreciate some input from you all on my next step for a lens. I am looking at the 70-200mm lens and have narrowed it down to either the Tamron VC or the Nikon VRII. I don’t think that I will be buying the f4 lens because I will be using it first for weddings, events and portraits and then for my own shooting. (landscapes, family events etc..)
The Nikon might be pretty much out of my $ range out of the gate.. but of all the examples in Flickr, it seems to have a slight edge in color over the Tamron. Both are equally sharp. This lens will split duty with my Nikon 24-70mm which so far is my favorite working lens. I have three questions which I don’t think have been asked yet in all the threads that I have seen so far:
1. For the most part if I were to blow up a shot to a 20”x30” or larger shot would the Tamron remain as sharp as the Nikon VRII? (I shoot with a D600 FX camera)
2. Do I trust a Canadian dealer for Nikon/Tamron warranty work (6 years) to send the lens back to the Canadian factory? (Ebay has some really decent prices for these two lenses new.)
3. If I pick up a grey market lens where (besides Japan) can I get quality work done on the lens because Tamron USA has taken the Nikon no touch policy? (IE: non warranty work for $’s that you trust)
Any input you might have will be greatly appreciated, I am now in a position where I need to pick this lens up. I realized this recently at an event where I needed the range and as the daylight faded, I needed the f2.8 to compensate. (IMHO the f4 would not have worked…I think)
Thanks for your input..
|Kinderdijk by PEB|
from Best Landscape With at Least One Wind Mill.
|Lights of Manhattan by cand1d|
from Your City - Night Skyline
|Mornin Dew by Abbasi46|
from Macro world
|Crash and Boom by qhenson|
from My Best Photo of the Week