EF-M55-200mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
rrccad
Senior MemberPosts: 3,479Gear list
Like?
Re: definition of 'huge'
In reply to Lawrencew, 6 months ago

Lawrencew wrote:

rrccad wrote:

the E mount 55-200 is not nearly as small - and it's not just a little smaller - it's alot smaller than the EF-S 55-250mm STM

You mean its a lot smaller than the EF-S 55-250mm STM with the EF Adaptor.

actually it's smaller without the adapter, and alot smaller mounted on an M - i thought that would be self evident .. you know - picture being worth a thousand words and all?

Do you have any other magical means to mount it on an M that I'm not aware of.

And for that you give up 80mm of reach on an APS-C camera

and gain a much smaller and far more balanced unit on your M, and don't have to play around with a fiddly adapter.

and the ability to mount it on cameras that are actually sold by Canon in the USA...

and I care?  I hate to tell you but 4.44% of the earth's population lives in the united states, 22% of the GDP, and canon certainly isn't HQ'ed there.

Has the EF-M 55-200 been announced by Canon USA yet?

i'm not in the States, so to be honest, what Canon USA does is immaterial to me.  I do wish that Americans would stop making it sound like if it's not sold in the states it's irrelevant - it's actually quite annoying.

 rrccad's gear list:rrccad's gear list
Sigma DP2 Merrill Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS M
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow