EF-M55-200mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM?

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
Abu Mahendra
Senior MemberPosts: 2,319Gear list
Like?
Re: Comparison (weight/length) to CANON's EF-S 55-250 STM
In reply to rrccad, 3 months ago

rrccad wrote:

Abu Mahendra wrote:

rrccad wrote:

Abu Mahendra wrote:

Yeah, so SMART that the lens is NOT a no-brainer.

far more of a no brainer than your prime is.

What exactly is your problem, pal? Which prime? I own three of them, along with four zoom lenses. You are just sore because you were found seeing unicorns and leprechauns on another thread.

no, actually you were and are probably still trying to blow smoke up everyone's ass because you don't what you are talking about.

get back to me when you comprehend the difference between a focal length and an equivalent field of view.

Ok, so you do not deny that you are sore. Great....Right. Change the subject. The sad record (and demise) of the bizarre claim of "nasty edge distorsion" (talk about blowing up smoke up people's @rse!) and its devotees is all there on the forum record. I am not the one making up spurious claims and seeing things that have not been replicated by users here or the professional review sites.

Sorry, folks, Canuck stalker objections notwithstanding, if the alleged lens turns out to be real, I will be sticking with the EF-S 55-250 STM on the 650D for my lightweight, APS-C telefoto needs.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow