EF-M55-200mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM?

Started Jun 16, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Jonathan Brady
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,168Gear list
Comparison (weight/length) to CANON's EF-S 55-250 STM
In reply to Jonathan Brady, Jun 17, 2014

The EF-S 55-250 STM is actually just a touch longer than the E mount Sony tele lens mentioned above (3 mm longer) and heavier (30 grams heavier). But, if you're talking about mounting the EF-S 55-250 to the M, you obviously need the adapter as well. You're adding an additional 28mm and 110 grams. So, here's the final comparison...

EF-M 55-200 f/4.5-6.3 IS STM vs EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM + EF to EF-M adapter

Weight: 260 grams vs 485 grams

Length: 87mm vs 139mm

Focal range: 55-200 (88-320 FF equivalent) vs 55-250 (88-400 equivalent)

Aperture: f/4.5-6.3 vs f/4-5.6

So, the EF-M lens is 37% shorter and 43% lighter! Obviously, the EF-M 55-200 is 1/3 of a stop slower at the wide and tele end and is slightly lacking in the "reach" department. The diagonal angle of view at 320mm is 7.7 degrees and the diagonal angle of view at 400mm is 6.2 degrees. So, 1.5 degrees. Significant... but also NOT significant.

I said it before, I think the focal range and aperture range compromises were VERY smart on Canon's part!

 Jonathan Brady's gear list:Jonathan Brady's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 70D Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM +11 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow