Sigma's 18-35 f/1.8. why?

Started 5 months ago | Questions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
happysnapper64
Senior MemberPosts: 4,391Gear list
Like?
Sigma's 18-35 f/1.8. why?
5 months ago

I know there have been many threads on this lens, usually commenting on it's quality of IQ, build etc. I am just wondering, in light of many comments that have been made about this lens not being wide enough at 18mm & not long enough at 35mm. [Long enough & wide enough being subjective, of course] If this is true, why did Sigma make the lens with such an "odd" F/L? It does seem that it has a very limited usage, like nighttime or indoors. I wish it went to around the 50 mark, as 18 would be ok for the quite spacious interiors I usually shoot. Would it not have been better to make it a very fast 18-50/55, rather than a very limiting 18-35? Would making it into a 50/55 made it even heavier than it is? Just a thought that came to me while looking for a fast indoor prime.

-- hide signature --

lee uk.
There are old pilots, & there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots.
"I'm so fast, when I turn off the light, i'm in bed before the room gets dark" The great Muhammad Ali.

 happysnapper64's gear list:happysnapper64's gear list
Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 60D Olympus PEN E-PL5 Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS +8 more
ANSWER:
This question has not been answered yet.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow