Do I need a 70-200mm f2.8L IS II?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
hotdog321
Forum ProPosts: 10,699Gear list
Like?
Re: Do I need a 70-200mm f2.8L IS II?
In reply to Phil Geusebroek, 7 months ago

Phil Geusebroek wrote:

Thinking a long time on this but keep backing off. I have the F4 IS and it's wonderful. Am I missing something really special in not trying a lens most working pros consider a given?

I'm a photojournalist, so I'll chime in. If you shoot under low light or low light action, especially for a living, the f/2.8 is the way to go. Sports, podium shots, existing light head shots, etc. make the f/2.8 a wonderful tool for working pros.

But if you shoot under "normal" light and daylight, to heck with it. The f/2.8 is heavy and expensive and, if you need it, you already know it. Otherwise, the f/4 lens is terrific.

 hotdog321's gear list:hotdog321's gear list
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow