Do I need a 70-200mm f2.8L IS II?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
Great Bustard
Forum ProPosts: 24,681
Like?
"Need" is a strong word.
In reply to Phil Geusebroek, 7 months ago

Phil Geusebroek wrote:

Thinking a long time on this but keep backing off. I have the F4 IS and it's wonderful. Am I missing something really special in not trying a lens most working pros consider a given?

Do you "need" the more shallow DOF of f/2.8 over f/4?  Do you "need" the lower noise of, say, ISO 1600 over ISO 3200?  Do you "need" whatever resolution increase the f/2.8L II IS offers over the f/4L IS?  Do you "need" AF with a 2x TC (unless you have a camera that will AF at f/8, where the f/4L IS will also AF with a 2x TC)?

Or do you just want it, and it's worth the size, weight, and price?

No one can answer those questions but you.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow