Why do people still argue about equivalence?

Started May 22, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Mirrorless Crusader
Regular MemberPosts: 285Gear list
Re: Why do people still argue about equivalence?
In reply to Just another Canon shooter, May 22, 2014

Just another Canon shooter wrote:

Mirrorless Crusader wrote:

You'd have to be an idiot to read these forums and not understand what it means by now.

...and you don't.

In order for 50mm f/2.8 on FF to be truly equivalent to 25mm f/1.4 on MFT you'd have to shoot FF at quadruple the ISO value, which essentially negates FF's advantage in image quality.

It is called equivalence for a reason.

Right, so the only things that aren't equivalent are cost and weight. where on both counts FF loses by a landslide.

 Mirrorless Crusader's gear list:Mirrorless Crusader's gear list
Olympus Body Cap Lens 15mm F8.0
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow