Why do people still argue about equivalence?

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
Mirrorless Crusader
Regular MemberPosts: 263Gear list
Like?
Re: Why do people still argue about equivalence?
In reply to Just another Canon shooter, 3 months ago

Just another Canon shooter wrote:

Mirrorless Crusader wrote:

You'd have to be an idiot to read these forums and not understand what it means by now.

...and you don't.

In order for 50mm f/2.8 on FF to be truly equivalent to 25mm f/1.4 on MFT you'd have to shoot FF at quadruple the ISO value, which essentially negates FF's advantage in image quality.

It is called equivalence for a reason.

Right, so the only things that aren't equivalent are cost and weight. where on both counts FF loses by a landslide.

 Mirrorless Crusader's gear list:Mirrorless Crusader's gear list
Olympus Body Cap Lens 15mm F8.0
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
NoNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow