Liberal Return Policies vs. "has my camera been used?": A way to Solve This

Started May 6, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Midwest Forum Pro • Posts: 16,103
Re: Liberal Return Policies vs. "has my camera been used?": A way to Solve This

ne beginner wrote:

In this way, everyone gets what they expect. What do you think?

If people want to consider a camera that has been used AT ALL as 'used', then the mfr warranty is no longer in force and the camera is probably is worth at least 20% less now. The seller is still entitled to make a profit on it. I say, items tried and sent back for other than being seriously unsatisfactory should have a very healthy restocking fee attached to them, say 25%.

Defective items can only be returned for exchange, on another of the same model.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow