I'm NOT knocked out with RX100M2

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
Forum ProPosts: 20,060Gear list
Re: I'm NOT knocked out with RX100M2
In reply to knox, 10 months ago

knox wrote: I hate looking at an LCD to take photos and the add-on electronic viewfinder is too expensive to add to a camera when the images are just mediocre. I could deal with the regular viewfinder 'somewhat' if the images knocked me out. Maybe I expected too much. I admit I have not 'woodshedded' with it and got deep inside all the settings yet as I have been really busy . . . Is that where I will find the so called 'magic' everyone is talking about or did I just expect too much?

Your problem is you have an opinion as to what a photo should look like. The RX100 does take excellent photos but if you want a certain look you'll have to experiment with different settings or shoot RAW and process the photos to look the way you want. Except for the D3 all your cameras are film. Do you want a film like look? I'm a former film shooter from way, way back. I find the RX100 takes better quality photos than 35mm but whereas each film had a certain unique look, digital tends to look rather neutral unless you post process. As far as the LCD, I agree that most of the time a good eye level viewfinder is better.

-- hide signature --

Look at the picture, not the pixels
Miss use of the ability to do 100% pixel peeping is the bane of digital photography because it causes people to fret over inconsequential issues.

 tbcass's gear list:tbcass's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony SLT-A77 Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di USD +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow