auto ISO sucks with X cameras

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
John Carson
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,036Gear list
Like?
Re: auto ISO sucks with X cameras
In reply to biza43, 3 months ago

biza43 wrote:

wblink wrote:

Christof21 wrote:

Fuji could have implemented the minimum shutter speed but still taking account the focal length (most camera makers do have this implementation !). Do you know any recent camera which has an implementation like Fuji ?? If so, please tell me.

Surprise:

When you choose minimum shutterspeed, Fuji just ignores it when you are at max iso .....

-- hide signature --

Willem.
Fuji XE-2

Would you rather end up with an underexposed or black frame? In the end, it is up to us to decide... if the light is so low that you are at max ISO, and the shutter speed is not enough to allow a proper exposure, you can: give up; end up with a black image; use a tripod and do it properly.

-- hide signature --

www.paulobizarro.com

If motion blur is the concern, then a tripod won't help. The camera offers a maximum Raw ISO of 6400, but JPEG ISOs of 12800 and 25600. These JPEG ISOs are underexposed but then artificially brightened. There is nothing in principal wrong with doing the same when RAW ISO maxes out.

-- hide signature --

john carson

 John Carson's gear list:John Carson's gear list
Fujifilm X-E2 Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow