PIX 2015

>>> Street Photography eXchange #98 <<<

Started Apr 30, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Forum ProPosts: 13,401Gear list
Re: I hear you
In reply to geraldPP, May 5, 2014

geraldPP wrote:

fad wrote:

Sal18 wrote:


I agree that this photo has an unusual gravitas, the emotional moment and the physical presence of the figures. I would not change the windows. They add another dimension and add an evocative suggestion of the dimension of time in their lives (or not.) But I think they work best as an afterthought, a surprise that takes the breath away. First the viewer has to be smacked in the face with the physical and emotional presence of the couple.

This is way, way more powerful than usual, this photo. It is a realized work of art.

It is also technically fascinating, in the placement of figures making use of, conquering the limitations of, the restrictive locational palates you shoot in.

I hope this winds up on your wall.

I would spend the time to optimize the tones. They are a little muddy here. That may be the best treatment for the subject and light, but it's worth taking some time away and coming back again thinking through how does each tone decision affect the artistic communication.

Be very careful, Sal, not to be too much of a good girl. This shot I suspect comes close to defining your personal vision that only you can contribute to the world. Gerald, and others may suggest different ways of treating things, but here that would almost certainly be a big mistake. Gerald is brilliant and inventive at visually stunning composition, but he is not consistent (nor does he try to be) at revealing psychological truth. Humility is an artist's best friend. But there is a bedrock of vision that cannot be surrendered without the artist ceasing to exist.

-- hide signature --

shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
Always view all photos in Gallery or Original Size

Frank, why do you feel you have the right to discuss what you think are my psychological shortcomings publicly in a post to Sal? Take it to the back room with Sal and I won't care what you say.

If you want to feel superior about your psychological enlightenment I haven't seen it either in your work.

I am here to share with everyone but if you feel like I only make shallow, superficial photos then I would like everybody else to tell me so.

Please begin...I'll be out of here soon.

Gerald, how could you possibly misread what I said.   I did not say that you had "psychological shortcomings," whatever that might be.   I said that your photos do not always go to reveal psychological truth, nor do mine.   You are quite good at that when it is you intention.

What I said about you was not negative in any way.   You are an excellent photographer.   Many of your photos have psychological insight.  C'mon already, give me a break.

-- hide signature --

shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
Always view all photos in Gallery or Original Size

 fad's gear list:fad's gear list
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Nikon D3S Nikon D800 Nikon D4s Nikon D810 +9 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow