THE "BEST" SPORT AND ACTION camera

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
neil holmes
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,356
Like?
As many will say with DXO, don't just look at ranking...read the scores.
In reply to Lab D, 7 months ago

Lab D wrote:

Ontario Gone wrote:

Lab D wrote:

neil holmes wrote:

From what I have seen and from the first reviews, the AF does seem to work as hyped.

The GH4 while a bit slower in terms of FPS AF with tracking,

There seems to be confusion here. The GH4 in tests does tracking at 12 FPS but not 40 FPS.

I am not sure why you say it is a bit slower.

Hmm, that beats even the A6000

-- hide signature --

"Run to the light, Carol Anne. Run as fast as you can!"

I do not know much about Chip.de but they Rank the GH4 #1, Em-1 #2 and the A6000 #12.

I do know the A6000 cannot compete with the GH4 focusing in low light. Of course the GH4 is also a 4K video camera.

Seems like an ok website but I would not give it any more weight than the usual ones quoted.

They rate the A6000 as very good value.....score of 70 VS 46 for the GH4.

Also note the A6000 has a speed score of 94.6 vs 94 for the GH4 and image quality scores of 92.8 for the A6000 and 91.1 for the GH4

The a6000 is let down in their list only by handling which is 92.3 VS 77.6 for the A6000

That means at less than half the price, the A6000 seems the better choice for many people if you can put up with the a6000 handling.

http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dchip%2Bde%26biw%3D1366%26bih%3D596&rurl=translate.google.com.au&sl=de&u=http://www.chip.de/bestenlisten/Bestenliste-DSLR-und-DSLM--index/extended/id/968/&usg=ALkJrhgeUoWdLNDltFKjZrZV5XqlBROYdw

I probably wont get either but both seem very nice for different markets.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
TrueNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow