Sony vs Sigma primes: need the optical stabilization?

Started Apr 28, 2014 | Questions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
brosenbaum1 Junior Member • Posts: 27
Sony vs Sigma primes: need the optical stabilization?

Thinking of replacing my kit zoom (old NEX-3 with 18-55) with primes to get sharper photos. (Would love to upgrade the NEX body but can't really afford to)

Leaning toward  Sigma 19, 30, 60. The Sigmas rate sharper than Sony in DxO Mark,  and are far less expensive, as comparable Sony lenses BUT -

looks like the Sigmas have no optical stabilization. I usually don't carry a tripod - should I be concerned?

(I wonder in landscapes how dawn/dusk will work with no stabilization, also the occasional close-up)

thanks!

ANSWER:
This question has not been answered yet.
Sony Alpha NEX-3
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow