70-200 f4 not enough for full body photos?

Started Apr 26, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Paul Liukas
Regular MemberPosts: 349Gear list
70-200 f4 not enough for full body photos?
Apr 26, 2014

Hi friends,

I want your advice on people photography as I am not really good on this topic.

Today was first day out with Laura ( 4 weeks). I took some photos with my lenses, they are great, but just lacking something.. some more more blur?

I want to have a nice blur for full body + some background. As seen here Nikon 70-200 f4 (200 @ f4) is not the best? Or maybe this is not bad as background can be recognized, not blurred away?

If I had:

Nikon 70-200 2.8
Nikon 85 1.4 or Sigma 85 1.4

Could I get much better photos? or I need to go 135, 200 f2, 300 2.8 or similar way? (too expensive?)

I tried with my 50 1.8. Not the best solution for such object.

For images with close object, 70-200 f4 is perfect. But for such scenes is not the best.

Please advice how to get full body portraits at really nice bokeh. Which lenses you recommend?

Thanks. Paul

-- hide signature --

I still don't believe that my new 70-200 f4 beats Zeiss 100 f2. But this is true!


 Paul Liukas's gear list:Paul Liukas's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon PC-E Nikkor 24mm f/3.5D ED +6 more
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow