Do you think Canon will take on the A7?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
qianp2k
Forum ProPosts: 10,350Gear list
Like?
Re: This is how it's gotta go down...
In reply to Great Bustard, 6 months ago

Great Bustard wrote:

jimzenglish wrote:

...if Canon is to be successful in the mirrorless FF market.

  1. Either buy a sensor from Sony or make one at least as good.
  2. AF and CAF must be outstanding.
  3. EVF must be outstanding.
  4. Must debut with the following high quality lenses: 24 / 2 IS, 35 / 2 IS, 50 / 1.8 IS, and 85 / 1.8 IS.

Ok I'm obviously thick but I was more thinking of a mirrorless system utilising their existing lenses rather than creating a new range. I know this would make the system less compact than if they brought out a new range of suitable lenses but it would still give the user the option of going compact for the day with a 50mm 1.8 or similar.
I'm just thinking then a canon enthusiast could have a setup like a 5D for general work and the mirrorless for travelling but still using same lenses and keeping with full frame setup.

For sure, the camera must debut with an EF adapter. However, that's like adding a 1.4x TC to all your lenses, in terms of size of the system. As size and weight is one of the primary, if not the primary, reason for going mirrorless over SLR, coming out with small, light, fast, high IQ lenses right from the start is crucial to the success of the system.

That's a daunting task if possible - small, light, fast, high IQ all together.

FE 35/2.8 and FE 55/1.8 - small/light and great optical quality but not fast as they sacrifice max aperture to make small/light.

FE 24-70/4.0 OSS - small/light reasonable fast as compared to DSLR counterpart such as Canon 24-70L4.0 IS but sacrifice optical quality.

FE 70-200/4.0 OSS - big/heavy at 840g as almost the same as Nikon 70-200G/4.0 VR at 850g, and noticeably heavier/bigger than Canon 70-200L/4.0 IS (760g), optical quality is almost as good as Nikon copy, not the best at both ends (especially at 200mm) but in mid-range (as FE 24-70, a Sony's way to design zoom?).

I hear what you're saying in regards to the AF I have the EOS M and it's disappointing in that regard so would need to be improved.

And not just AF, but CAF.

Wondering if dual-pixel technology will help Canon to capture up in this area. We know sensor-based PDAF has its side effect impacting IQ. If dual-pixel is better in this area and also has other benefits as Canon claimed in next version?

 qianp2k's gear list:qianp2k's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS-1D Mark III Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark III Sony Alpha 7R +20 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow