Resolution isn't coverage of an area, it's linear

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
RichRMA
Contributing MemberPosts: 743Gear list
Like?
Resolution isn't coverage of an area, it's linear
3 months ago

A lot of people seem to equate double the resolution with doubling the pixel count.  It doesn't work that way.  Want to double the resolution (resolve detail twice as small) with a camera?  You have to double the pixel count in both x and y dimensions.  So, if the camera has a 3000x2000 pixel array (6 megapixels), you need 6000x4000 or 24 megapixels to double resolution.  To double that, you need 12000x8000 (96 megapixels).  So, it's four times the pixels that allows doubling resolution.  That is why (when you really look at an image) resolution gains going from say 24mp to 36mp are really not that impressive.

 RichRMA's gear list:RichRMA's gear list
Nikon D70s Nikon D200 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Pentax K-01 Olympus OM-D E-M5
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow