Sutter Shock? Pictures from the holy land. Locked

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
Pixnat2
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,191Gear list
Could I add one category?
In reply to XMN, 3 months ago

XMN wrote:

To me, there are 2 main groups in this SS debate, and they are not just the simple 'SS believers' and 'SS deniers'.

1º group: 'I have SS, i am not doing anything wrong, you surely have it too, you just don't know how to search for it'

2º group: 'I don't have it, i know how to search for it, you surelly don't have too, you just don't know how to old a camera'

This is almost polarized in this two almost fanatic groups when for me, there are at least 4 groups:

1 - People that really have SS

2 - Peolple that really don't have SS

3 - People that think they have SS but just don't know how to old a camera

4 - People that think they don't have SS but just don't know how to search for it (or don't care for it)

I conced that at least this 4 groups exist. Extremists positions such as: "if i see it/don't see it, you must/must not also" don't cut it for me.

Sample variation in cameras DOES exist. Is that so hard to believe?

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53439799

5 - People who had SS but never worried about it. Then upgraded to FW 1.3, saw with their own eyes the benefits of the 0s antishock, and said thank you to Olympus for this nice option.

Those people don't care about what causes the blur, but are happy it's gone in their camera, and know that samples variations is a fact

I'm in.

-- hide signature --

Cheers,
Frederic
http://azurphoto.com/

Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow