Pixels vs Dynamic range and high ISO

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
BoatGuy
Regular MemberPosts: 148Gear list
Like?
Pixels vs Dynamic range and high ISO
3 months ago

With the a7s Sony has thrown down the challenge.  End the pixel wars and shift the discussion to dynamic range and low light performance.

How many pixels will you give up to get better low light performance and higher dynamic range?  And of course with less pixels the frame rate will rise even further.

And does it also reduce the importance of large apertures?  Do you need larger than f2.8 if you've got much higher usable ISO and dynamic range?

And what will they do with this in the APS-C space?

Also keep in mind that ignoring yields for the moment, the cost of producing any full frame sensor is the same as another.  I.e., a7/r/s sensors should cost the same amount to produce.

This is going to get very interesting!

-- hide signature --

Be here now, be someplace else later.
http://www.newmorning.info/page41/page41.html

 BoatGuy's gear list:BoatGuy's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony a6000 Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS +1 more
Sony Alpha 7 Sony Alpha 7S
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow