Do I really need Raw

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
phototransformations
Senior MemberPosts: 2,776Gear list
Like?
Re: Do I really need Raw
In reply to John Beavin, 4 months ago

I'm pretty careful about exposure and JPEG engines are pretty good these days, so most of the time the improvement in RAW vs JPEG is not huge. (This was also true, in the old days, of the differences between slide film and negative film.) Where the RAW files have a great advantage is in shadow and highlight recovery (also true of the negative film).

Here are two versions of the same window which I deliberately shot at +2 EV from the metered exposure. In the JPEG, the highlights were unrecoverable. In the RAW, the image contains almost as much highlight detail as the JPEG that was shot as metered by the camera.

JPEG overexposed two stops, processed in Photoshop

RAW file captured simultaneously, processed in ACR and Photoshop

 phototransformations's gear list:phototransformations's gear list
Samsung TL500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +23 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow