D9300 - For real or just another tease?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
StillLearning
Senior MemberPosts: 1,866
Like?
Re: D9300 - For real or just another tease?
In reply to Tony Beach, 4 months ago

Tony Beach wrote:

StillLearning wrote:

Tony Beach wrote:

seahawk wrote:

But if you look at the specs - a D7200 would need to be an up-grade from the D7100 and superior to the D5300 while being below the D9300. Unless there is a new AF module for the D9300 and it is aiming for a much higher performance than I am expecting, this will be not easy.

51p AF, D800 metering, 6FPS (8 with grip) - leaves not much room for a D7200 imho.

Why assume that the D7200 is going to be updated any time soon? The timeline has been:

  • D80 announced in September, 2006.
  • D90 announced in August, 2008.
  • D7000 announced in September, 2010.
  • D7100 announced in August, 2013.

A D7200 isn't due until September 2015, so we are talking about something more than the D7100 for now.

Also, more fps, a larger buffer, and more external controls are enough to distinguish a D300/D300s replacement from a D7100 replacement. There has also been an improvement in AF going from the D4 to the D4s, so that's an area where a D9300 could also distinguish itself from a D7200.

D7100 had to been announced in 2012.

No, but...

My mistake

I bought my first one in May of 2013.

My mistake, it was announced in February, 2013.

I normally don't buy one this close to announcement but I guess I was sucked in.  Actually it was worth it.

That would put D7200 later this year following the same scheduling.

D80 to D90 was almost two years; D90 to D7000 was just over two years; D7000 to D7100 was 18 months. There's nothing set in stone about the update schedule for any camera line -- it was nearly three years between the D100 and the D200, and during that interim it looked as though the D70 had eclipsed the D100 line (sound familiar?), then the D300 replaced the D200 in under two years.

My mistake in thinking it was late 2012 announcement.  That would put it early 2015 but as noted they (Nikon) are calling the shots.

This will be interesting where the D9300 will fit in the schema.

If there is a D9300, and if Nikon's latest numbers mean anything, then obviously it will fit above the D7100 and below the D610 (at least as far as price is concerned, but if rumors are to be believed and come to fruition then the different formats dictate that you pay more for the larger sensor and give up some of the features).

This really was kept under wraps. Something has forced this leak.

It's still just a rumor. The "source" is Nikon Rumors, so their name says it all.

Correct it is only a rumor but I take heart that when the last Nikon D400 rumor appeared on NR it was some known person that had it on their blog.  NR did say they didn't have any reliable info at the time.  This time he did acknowledge he had his first reliable source.  Hope that is true but I'm not in the position to get one this year because my tax return went on another D7100.

The up coming Canon 70D Mk II? Response to the Pentax K-3 or was this the planned all along?

I'll wait until I see these Canon and Nikon cameras before I speculate about why it's taken as long as it has for Canon and/or Nikon to make a move in this sector, assuming they actually do make that move.

We will wait to see if a May announcement of the Canan 70D2 is forth coming.  We know both companies have their spies in each others camp so neither one will probably get much of a jump.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow