Why not a 12-35 F1.8 - F2.8?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Sergey_Green
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,893Gear list
Like?
Re: Image quality
In reply to TrapperJohn, 5 months ago

TrapperJohn wrote:

The 12-35 is actually a F1.8-2.8. When you zoom down to 12mm, the aperture closes down to F2.8.

As the 12-35 already exhibits a bit of IQ degradation when shot wide open at 12mm, that will only get worse as the aperture opens up further. They could shoot it at F1.8/12mm, but you probably wouldn't like the results.

Agreed. It is likely more difficult to make such lens for a smaller format.

Don't know if the constant aperture µ43 lenses can do this, but with my ZD 7-14 constant F4, I can get it to open up to F2.8 at 7mm, by pressing the lens release button and disconnecting the electronics, which opens up the aperture. What you find is that the ZD 7-14, at 7mm/F2.8, looks... very weird. Definitely overly soft. Nothing you'd want to use, unless you like strange looking photos.

Definitely. Which means it was deliberately throttled by Olympus just not to show how bad it was. Even Tokinas did far better at 11mm f/2.8 on Dx cameras (which is equivalent to around 8mm on FT).

-- hide signature --

- sergey

 Sergey_Green's gear list:Sergey_Green's gear list
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow