Why not a 12-35 F1.8 - F2.8?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Hen3ry
Senior MemberPosts: 9,184Gear list
Like?
I would have been happy with f2.8-f4 12-45
In reply to Fredrik Glckner, 5 months ago

Fredrik Glckner wrote:

Personally, I think the lens should have been made with specifications like, e.g., 12-45mm f/2.5-3.5, which could probably have been done at approx the same size and price point. But this deviates from the "traditional" specifications of a pro standard zoom lens.

The 12-35 f2.8 is a nice piece of work, though!

Cheers, geoff

-- hide signature --

Geoffrey Heard
Down and out in Rabaul in the South Pacific
http://pngtimetraveller.blogspot.com/2011/10/return-to-karai-komana_31.html

 Hen3ry's gear list:Hen3ry's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow