Why not a 12-35 F1.8 - F2.8?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Laszlo13
Contributing MemberPosts: 810Gear list
Like?
Re: Why not a 12-35 F1.8 - F2.8?
In reply to superstar905, 5 months ago

superstar905 wrote:

If Sony can make a 28-70 at the equivalent aperture as noted in the subject, why can't we have one for a M43s lens? I mean, the 12-35 is a constant F2.8, but if you compare to the Zeiss offering being the same size as the Panny zoom, I don't see why not......

You would not gain much.  At wider angles, you wouldn't get much better subject isolation, and speed isn't as critical for hand holding.  There's a reason lenses are judged by their aperture at the long end, not short end, and hence why fixed aperture lenses are desirable.  Basically, a 1.8-2.8 wouldn't get you a whole lot more - except size and cost.

 Laszlo13's gear list:Laszlo13's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow