Any Reason to get D5300 over A6000?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
wb2trf
Senior MemberPosts: 1,496
Like?
Re: Any Reason to get D5300 over A6000?
In reply to Jkim7, 9 months ago

Right now the only thing missing on the A6000 are native long lenses >200mm.  If you want to get something long with image stabilization you have to get an LA-EA2 adapter and a non-Sony IS lens. The long A mounts from Sony won't give you IS.  If I thought that was very important, and that issue was bigger for me than all the A6000 advantages, of size and probably better AF and video, I'd get the 5300.  Substantively, except for its bulk and the fact that you are collecting the wrong lenses for the long term, the 5300 is also a great camera.  (In the long term collecting F mount lenses is going to be something everyone is going to want to escape from, but there's a few years left yet before that becomes totally obvious.)

Personally I don't subscribe to the "one sensor (camera) many lenses" model anymore, however.  I think it is pretty obsolete.  For long zoom reach I use a superzoom because the shooting I do with that is all in bright light where sensor size doesn't matter much.  The whole camera costs less than a decent long lens for APS-C and gives good results with more fun.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow