16-55 and 55-140/2.8

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
forpetessake
Senior MemberPosts: 3,870
Like?
makes no sense
In reply to ryan2007, 8 months ago

ryan2007 wrote:

Starred wrote:

I wonder what these lenses will weight.
Does someone have an educated quess?

I would compare them to the Panasonic 12-35 and 35-100 mm 2.8 and add half a pound to account for the larger sensor it needs to cover.

I think cost will be equal to the Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Makes no sense. Those are very different lenses for very different systems. The Panasonic lenses in APS-C equivalent are: 16-47mm f/3.7 and 47-133mm f/3.7 -- almost a stop dimmer! All things being equal the weight and price increase as square to cube of the f-stop.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow