12-32 vs 14-42 (ii) vs 14-45

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
nevada5
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,428Gear list
Like?
Re: 12-32 vs 14-42 (ii) vs 14-45
In reply to Conor OBrien, 9 months ago

I used the 14-45 with three G series cameras and I really enjoyed it.  When I had a G5 I bought the 14-42 II.  No question in my mind it's a better lens.  Small and light has value and the fact that it only extends about 1/4" when zooming makes it a joy to use.

But IQ is what counts.  The II lens is every bit as sharp as the 14-45, probably a tad sharper.  But there is a definite difference in out-of-focus areas.  The 14-45 produces a very nervous bokeh - IMO it can be very unattractive.  That doesn't exist with the 14-42 II.

I use the II lens on my GX7 all the time.  I won't get my 20mm1.7 out of the bag unless the light drops significantly.

I'm presently contemplating buying the 12-32.  My big fear is that it won't live up to the IQ of the II lens and then I won't want to use it.

-- hide signature --

Life is short - drive a convertible.
Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society. Aristotle

 nevada5's gear list:nevada5's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Samsung NX300M
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow