RAW and JPG files

Started Mar 17, 2014 | Discussions thread
Bob Tullis
Forum ProPosts: 28,657Gear list
Like?
Re: Trash both those files
In reply to brycesteiner, Mar 17, 2014

brycesteiner wrote:

Bob Tullis wrote:

These aren't simply underexposed. They're total failures of exposure. The shutter speed was way to high, ISO low, inappropriate for that objective. And the results from the developing attempt is just horrible.

Don't shoot for RAW until you come to understand how to make a decent exposure for JPGs that don't need extreme corrections post-exposure. RAW isn't for fixing bad exposures and techniques, it's an aide for good techniques that call for post-exposure development.

-- hide signature --

...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobtullis/
.
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Chief Dan George, Little Big Man
.

Oh, I didn't keep them at all. It was just the first shot that after coming from a sports event. The other pictures are near perfect from the JPGs.

I was just seeing how people get results from RAW when the picture is a completely failure on exposure. Did you use the RAW or JPG?

The ORF file.

-- hide signature --

...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobtullis/
.
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Chief Dan George, Little Big Man
.

 Bob Tullis's gear list:Bob Tullis's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Olympus E-M1 Sony Alpha 7S Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/35 Voigtlander 28mm F2 Ultron +31 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow