Sony A6000 already outdated by Nikon v3...........

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
nzmacro
Veteran MemberPosts: 9,563Gear list
Like?
Re: V3 actually cheaper than a6000...
In reply to FEJ, 7 months ago

FEJ wrote:

... when paired with a decent set of equivalent lenses. At least this is the set of lenses I would get:

The V3 kit is $300 cheaper and weighs about 3/4 as much.

In particular, the 50mm equiv f/1.8 lens is the lens I would probably use most of the time, and appears considerably easier to pocket.

The problem there is that users in here already own Sony lenses. All they might need is a body. So it would be expensive to change, same as if a Nikon 1 user wanted to change.

If I wanted a V3 for example being a MF legacy user, all I would need is the body only and that would be more expensive than getting an A6000.

All the best.

Danny.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Why?New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow