Sony A6000 already outdated by Nikon v3...........

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
nzmacro
Forum ProPosts: 10,000Gear list
Like?
Re: V3 actually cheaper than a6000...
In reply to FEJ, 9 months ago

FEJ wrote:

... when paired with a decent set of equivalent lenses. At least this is the set of lenses I would get:

The V3 kit is $300 cheaper and weighs about 3/4 as much.

In particular, the 50mm equiv f/1.8 lens is the lens I would probably use most of the time, and appears considerably easier to pocket.

The problem there is that users in here already own Sony lenses. All they might need is a body. So it would be expensive to change, same as if a Nikon 1 user wanted to change.

If I wanted a V3 for example being a MF legacy user, all I would need is the body only and that would be more expensive than getting an A6000.

All the best.

Danny.

 nzmacro's gear list:nzmacro's gear list
Sony Mavica CD1000 +10 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Why?New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow