Buy or pass on V3? Poll.

Started Mar 13, 2014 | Polls thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Forum ProPosts: 24,436Gear list
Re: I voted 2
In reply to mosswings, Mar 13, 2014

mosswings wrote:

rhlpetrus wrote:

I'm still very disappointed with the way Nikon have been treating their consumer base, DX and CX, regarding lenses and pro level suppor (DX). I actually like the V3, despite the high price, which will come down quickly. I don't get their policies, which, btw, is the norm in the ML field, start very high and drop fast.

Nikon have always been about FF, and that is becoming more and more the case. They were never able, like Oly or Canon have, to produce excellent compacts (and I'm talking about their long history, since the 1950s). DX was an intermediate period, until the got the D3 right, and they have produced very few good dedicated zooms to that system.

I think I will give a chance to an m43, GX7 or OM10, and a fast zoom. If that works well in comparison to the D7000, I may drop DX as well and get an FF for when it's needed. But maybe it won't be needed. Nikon, you are slowly losing a long-time friend.

-- hide signature --

OnExposure member
Good shooting and good luck
(after Ed Murrow)

Gotta admit, Renato, Nikon's not grokking a trend here. Oly's EM-10 is very intriguing and right-priced, and getting an f2.8 midrange zoom that's the size of a f4-5.6 DX kit zoom is tantalizing. The loss of 2/3 stop in S/N seems almost irrelevant, and there's not much DOF difference. Only the tenuous finances of the u4/3 manufacturers is a worry, but heck, the way Nikon seems to be going they'll be there soon anyway.

Series 1's draw has always been SPEED. The V3 seems to be targeted at daylight wildlife shooters needing ungodly effective FLs. But Sony hit the Series 1's target market (the grudging 1.5 lens owner) much better with the RX100II and RX-10. The V3 could attack the RX-10, but I don't see Nikon making a 24-200 f2.8 zoom anytime soon, and the entire package would probably top $3000. With an FT-1 and an f-mount tele, it definitely would.

If the A6000 turns out well, well, that may be another nail in the coffin.

Dang, but Hogan was right 2 years ago when he went u4/3 for his backpacking stuff. Ming Thein uses almost nothing else but an EM-1 (and a D800 but only in the studio), and Kirk Tuck went mirrorless long ago. And after this last long trip with a D7100, I've begun to feel - photographically - pointlessly fat and heavy.

It seems there's a virus in the air ...

PS: a D610 for now and then, or for a sudden serious shooting opp, still looks like a nice thing to have. But an OM1 + OM10/GX7 looks like a nice duo.

-- hide signature --

OnExposure member
Good shooting and good luck
(after Ed Murrow)

 rhlpetrus's gear list:rhlpetrus's gear list
Leica D-Lux (Typ 109) Nikon D7000 Nikon 1 V1 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF Nikon AF Nikkor 35mm f/2D +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow